NASA not responding to FOIA about atypical size and luminisioty of Apollo moon "sun" photos, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 46 times


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 07:27 AM by hawaiinguy12
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to
post by Agent_USA_Supporter



The Moon Landing was not faked. None of the claims made by conspiracy theorists to support a hoax hold any water at all and all have been debunked.

Simple logic proves we went to the moon. Thousands of top scientists worked for nearly a decade to ready the moon landing, that would mean thousands would have to be in on the conspiracy. And why bother building a massive uber expensive Saturn V rocket if you've got a trusty moonscape studio

We're talking rocket scientists. They designed the lunar lander and all the equipment with the intent of going to the moon. Many people watched the rocket launch. Are telling me they wasted that kind of money to launch an empty Saturn V into space and not even make an attempt at the moon?

After the moon landing footage and photos were released and yet not one single moon scientist anywhere in the WORLD cried foul. If there were any truth to the claims of the conspiracy theorists the experts and scientists would see it and know it. The Russians especially would have gone ape if they had even the slightest inkling of a hoax. Not a single legitimate scientist, whether they worked for NASA or not, has ever come forth to support the moon landing hoax and all claims of said hoax have been disproved.

The OP of this thread is absurd. We're dealing with a really big bright lens flare, nothing more.

[edit on 16-3-2010 by Titen-Sxull]


None of what you said makes a valid argument. This whole "If it didnt happen then someone would have blown the whistle" has been used time and time before. Like oh let me just say...9/11? Im not saying that we did or did not land because personally I have my own theories.


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 07:40 AM by octotom
reply to post by GoldenFleece



I've always asked, does anyone seriously believe that we went to the moon in this?

I bet people said the same thing about the Wright brother's plane.

"Does anyone really believe they flew through the air with just a bunch of wood?"


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 07:42 AM by butcherguy
reply to post by hawaiinguy12

Yep, it is paper.

And the foil is from old Wrigleys gum wrappers.

And the space shuttle is made of marshmallows and tar-paper.





reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 07:46 AM by franspeakfree
reply to post by GoldenFleece



Can you please provide more information in regards to your photo, ie do you have proof that this photo shows us without doubt that this was used in space Is there any information that can be collaborated with NASA.


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 07:48 AM by CHRLZ



reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 07:49 AM by hawaiinguy12
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to
post by hawaiinguy12

Yep, it is paper.

And the foil is from old Wrigleys gum wrappers.

And the space shuttle is made of marshmallows and tar-paper.



Oh ok that explains it all! How did I not read the little wrigleys label on the bottom before? And as for the marshmallows on the spaceshuttle, I think the radiation would have made it turn into 3x it size like in the microwave making and even more tasty treat


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 07:57 AM by butcherguy
Originally posted by hawaiinguy12
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to
post by hawaiinguy12

Yep, it is paper.

And the foil is from old Wrigleys gum wrappers.

And the space shuttle is made of marshmallows and tar-paper.



Oh ok that explains it all! How did I not read the little wrigleys label on the bottom before? And as for the marshmallows on the spaceshuttle, I think the radiation would have made it turn into 3x it size like in the microwave making and even more tasty treat
Hello!
I am glad that you have a sense of humor, it is entirely lacking in a growing # of posters lately.

I am convinced that I could post a youtube video explaining that the shuttle is made out of marshmallows and show how it is much smaller when launched than when it lands, and get a following of people that believe it, and then expand on my fallacious theory.
On topic. Lens flare, that's all.



reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 07:59 AM by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by franspeakfree
reply to
post by GoldenFleece


Can you please provide more information in regards to your photo, ie do you have proof that this photo shows us without doubt that this was used in space Is there any information that can be collaborated with NASA.

I frequently get this question because the photos look so ridiculous. But I assure you, just like the OP's photos, they're very real and they can all be found in the Project Apollo Image Gallery:

www.apolloarchive.com... (click on Apollo 11 and then go to JSC scan AS11-40-5915.)



[edit on 3/16/2010 by GoldenFleece]


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 08:03 AM by hawaiinguy12
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by hawaiinguy12
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to
post by hawaiinguy12

Yep, it is paper.

And the foil is from old Wrigleys gum wrappers.

And the space shuttle is made of marshmallows and tar-paper.



Oh ok that explains it all! How did I not read the little wrigleys label on the bottom before? And as for the marshmallows on the spaceshuttle, I think the radiation would have made it turn into 3x it size like in the microwave making and even more tasty treat
Hello!
I am glad that you have a sense of humor, it is entirely lacking in a growing # of posters lately.

I am convinced that I could post a youtube video explaining that the shuttle is made out of marshmallows and show how it is much smaller when launched than when it lands, and get a following of people that believe it, and then expand on my fallacious theory.
On topic. Lens flare, that's all.

Hahh yeah I felt like sturring it up a bit to ease all this in fighting. I for one hate the moon landing topic because all tho some people bring dicey evidence to the table IE. OP..It still makes your mind think a bit outside of the lines. Anyway Ill be waiting on your youtube video on marshmallow spaceships and hopfully you put in a bit about candy covered moon mountains


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 08:04 AM by franspeakfree
reply to post by GoldenFleece



Thanks for that, I am trying to obtain the facts without all the backchat and trolling. Can anyone from NASA verify without prejudice that these images are factual and correct? if so we can then start from there.

What I see in the photo looks very fragile and amateurish and I would be interested to find out its function/purpose. For the record I have not seen this photo before.

I also wanted to add in regards to the undisturbed soil it is possible that the soil on the moon is not like our soil on earth ie it could be entirely plausible to suggest that the soil on the moon is compacted and that when the craft landed, instead of leaving an impression it may have scuffed away the dirt. That I believe is possible no? If not could you provide some form of evidence to suggest that if a heavy object was to land on the moon it would make an imprint in to the soil



[edit on 16-3-2010 by franspeakfree]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Next week all military bases go on 3-week alert
  Posted 2 days ago with 10 member flags
The US Military Can Clearly Afford A Major Budget Cut
  Posted 19 days ago with 5 member flags
DARPA Cheetah runs faster than Usain
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags
Air Force Seeking Cyber-Weapons
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags
Space Enabled Effects for Military Engagements (Seeme)
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags