Time and time again I've read posts stating that "Under no circumstances is killing justified...". Or "the means don't justify the end...".
Posts along these lines are ignorant. Let me start by saying that the circumstances (and I know
many will disagree) in which someone is killed
can actually have a legitimate reason *gasps*. Let me give an example.
Mr. Harvey is your average working class man. He lives in a small house with his wife and children. One night he hears noises coming from the living
room. He grabs his shotgun and proceeds to search for the source of the noise. Upon entering the living room he sees a man wielding a knife. Mr.
Harvey yells a warning at the intruder, Who then rushes towards Mr. Harvey. Mr. Harvey fires off two shots and kills the intruder.
Now for those who still say that killing
cannot be justified, Place yourself in Mr. Harvey's shoes. If a stranger rushed at you with a knife,
Putting yourself and your family in danger, Would you still say that killing this man is wrong, Would you try do the
right thing and talk it
out*sarcastic*? Or would you pull the trigger? To elaborate further the
Castle
Doctrine states that deadly force may be used in cases where you feel your or someone elses life is in danger.
Killing for a cause can also be justified. Now I know that I will get
alot of comments saying I'm full of hatred, Have no heart, is
ignorant... etc. Just keep in mind that these are my opinions. Freedom of speech

. Would you be willing to kill or die for your country? If you
answered 'yes' then you have just agreed to killing for a cause. You may not even agree on the reason but because you've killed, You've killed on
behalf of someone else. Let's take the Iraq war. Your killing because your fighting terrorism... and because you want the oil

. Is that not a just
cause? To fight to protect something?
With this I leave you to your thoughts.
*Expects alot of negative feedback*