Does science know why electrons vanish out of existence for a second and appear in another place?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 10-3-2010 @ 06:26 PM by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
Are you talking about an electron being in all places at once? Quantum superposition?

en.wikipedia.org...

Or quantum entanglement, a phenomena where an electron is 'tickled' here and another electron anywhere else, no matter distance, can feel it?

en.wikipedia.org...

We can throw them both together to get Quantum teleportation. It essentially uses quantum entanglement to transmit information.

en.wikipedia.org...

Sorry for Wiki, but since they pay the most, they're top of the list, I can get more in depth sources if you need them.

EMM


reply posted on 10-3-2010 @ 06:33 PM by masqua
Virtual Particles DO pop in and out of existence. The universe is indeed a strange and incomprehensible place.

Here are some external quotes and sources:

Virtual particles are indeed real particles. Quantum theory predicts that every particle spends some time as a combination of other particles in all possible ways. These predictions are very well understood and tested.

Quantum mechanics allows, and indeed requires, temporary violations of conservation of energy, so one particle can become a pair of heavier particles (the so-called virtual particles), which quickly rejoin into the original particle as if they had never been there. If that were all that occurred we would still be confident that it was a real effect because it is an intrinsic part of quantum mechanics, which is extremely well tested, and is a complete and tightly woven theory--if any part of it were wrong the whole structure would collapse.

www.scientificamerican.com...


Way back in 1948:

These fascinating variations in the appearance of energy, which sometimes manifests itself as light, sometimes as matter, have stimulated the distinguished French physicist Auger to exclaim enthusiastically, in a monograph on cosmic radiation: "Who has said that there is no poetry in modern, exact and complicated science? Consider only the twin-birth of two quick and lively electrons of both kinds when an overenergetic light quantum brushes too closely against an atom of matter! And think of their death together when, tired out and slow, they meet once again and fuse, sending out into space as their last breath two identical grains of light, which fly off carrying their souls of energy!"
nobelprize.org...


And, in big print:

"Another way of thinking about these things is to imagine that all of space, even empty space, is awash with particles, that nature in her infinite wisdom can provide. This is not a metaphor. One of the implications of quantum theory is that these particles do in fact pop in and out of existence in the void. The particles,. . . are all temporary. They are created and then quickly disappear --- a bazaar of seething activity."

web.rollins.edu...



reply posted on 10-3-2010 @ 06:43 PM by Maddogkull
reply to post by Bedlam



Yeah What the bleep is not the best, but My opinion is that Staurt Hameroff is a genius. Him and Nassim are probably my favourite scientists. They def have some good opinions. Every sceptic or atheist that tried to debunk Stuarts theory couldn’t. He has a logical argument for every debate he has been in, talking about quantum states in the brain.


reply posted on 10-3-2010 @ 06:51 PM by Maddogkull
reply to post by masqua



Thank you for the post, it has helped. But now I am even more confused. Someone just said that they actually don’t pop into existence but actually are at 2 places at once. Now they do actually pop in and out of existence? Confusing.. Lol


reply posted on 10-3-2010 @ 07:13 PM by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
reply to post by Maddogkull



Then I'd browse the wiki pages I posted, should give you some more questions.

EMM



reply posted on 10-3-2010 @ 07:20 PM by Maddogkull
reply to post by seattletruth



If you like Nassims theorys i guess you could say that. It has not been proven though. I dont think it has atleast?


reply posted on 10-3-2010 @ 08:48 PM by TeslaandLyne
The electron is captured by the atom in shells, bands and orbits of
travel that will never be spotted yet they always have mass and
charge and exist and obey the rules of Relativistic Quantum
Mechanics.
Tesla knew Thompson the discoverer of the electron.
Tesla worked on forms of radio transmission for the most part.
Even though being famous for death rays and haarp due to the
high voltage we don't think that he might be able to send an
electron out into the air which he said would shine like a star.

We get things like this on the web:
“There is no such thing as an electron,” said Tesla, That item of
quantum vocabulary "electron" is not to be found anywhere in his writings.
Somebody should print this quotation on tee shirts and conduct a campaign
to stamp out the fashion that requires such excruciating utterances as: "A
Tesla coil is a quantum action device ... if the phase of a split quantum
particle is changed, its conjugate partner instantly knows ..."

www.teslapress.com...
I call where this web talk comes from lala land for Tesla talkers.
Tesla talked of the 'medium' or the ether which he 'pushed' around
with high voltage. The 'pushing' involved a flow of charge carriers.
With HVAC being made to flow in one direction the charge became
greater and greater at which he said any potential may be achieved.

Tesla did talk of the electron as being different the stated norm of bring
indivisible. So Tesla was more advanced saying the electron has
components and I recall the idea of an electron without the hold of the
atom as being outrageously bright. If anyone had millions of volts to
knock out electron into the air that might be Tesla.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 12 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 8 hours ago, 52 replies