Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
And I indirectly answered your dumb question with my own question.

Apparently my logic went way beyond your reasoning capabilities to the point of you attacking and insulting me.

[edit on 7-3-2010 by EarthCitizen07]

My stupid question was about remote piloting systems. This is your entire response here -

And I have one important question for you. Can you please show me the obituary of all the dead passengers and crew of those ALLEGED FLIGHTS?

Thanks and then I JUST MIGHT take you seriously....

Please explain to me how that answers my question about the wiring being inside. I am sorry that you seem to suffer so greatly but I actually never insulted or attacked you once. I did ask you to go ahead and feel stupid for me but I never attacked you one time.

I would really love to hear how this completely unrelated question about dead passengers answered my stupid question. Please show me the logic as it is obviously way beyond my reasoning capabilities.

If yea can fly a model airplane by remote , then there should be no problem with a scaled up job of the Jets in question, IMO I think there's more to the Pods than meets the eye! an what about our friend the White Jumbo Jet seen in the Sky on 9/11? I bet Chaney an his mates were jerking off looking at the crime below!

[edit on 8-3-2010 by DCDAVECLARKE]

Originally posted by dereks

Then why havent you posted this "damning and overwhelming" evidence then?

I suggest you book a night off from the outside world and spend it researching Bonez`s threads/posts, not many here beat his articulately researched input.

You mean claims like mini nukes being used, holographic airplanes, pod carrying airplanes, beam weapons, invisible silent explosives.... and you think that they are valid claims?

This approach of completely falsifying an assessment of someone by labelling them to aspects, they have neither expressed agreements with nor used them as sources, is still the basis of the cookie cutting debunking strategy here then .

Except the "truth" movement offers nothing in the way of evidence, no peer reviewed articles, just websites made by people pushing their own particular conspiracy trying to make money from 9/11

The Truth movement brings a lot more to the table regarding all aspects, than those who labelled people as `Truthers` whom have the ability to think for themselves. Instead of tarring with the `Anyone who disbelieves the OS is obviously a sandwich short of a picnic brush`, put your case forward by supplying 100% evidence enforcing the OS, the best way of strengthening any case for, and thus getting a point over is beating the other guy with superior evidence, facts, reliable sources, but here, as is the norm, just doesn`t happen, ask yourself why?.

Except there are no "professional research orginisations" inside the truth movement - if there are, care to name them?

The real professional orginisations totally ignore the silly truth movement

I find this reply outstanding, here we have you - a staunch believer of fables, supporting with blind faith those responsible whose whole statements depicting the event, is structured around - disregarding science, physics, 503 1st responders testimonies, involving 20,000+ pages detailing completely overlooked aspects, which heavily contradict the OS, and so much more.

So, a challenge for you, bring here the irrefutable proof that makes anyone whom does not believe the OS, is obviously suffering from mental problems, as the case for, must surely have concrete evidence enforcing it to such a status as to why people like me, whom completely disagree with the OS are clearly nutjobs.

But then again, you strike me as the sort of person that labels the B.B.C. report regarding the collapse of WTC7 22 minutes prematurely, as just another newsreader goof.