Originally posted by dereks
Then why havent you posted this "damning and overwhelming" evidence then?
I suggest you book a night off from the outside world and spend it researching Bonez`s threads/posts, not many here beat his articulately researched
You mean claims like mini nukes being used, holographic airplanes, pod carrying airplanes, beam weapons, invisible silent explosives.... and you think
that they are valid claims?
This approach of completely falsifying an assessment of someone by labelling them to aspects, they have neither expressed agreements with nor used
them as sources, is still the basis of the cookie cutting debunking strategy here then
Except the "truth" movement offers nothing in the way of evidence, no peer reviewed articles, just websites made by people pushing their own
particular conspiracy trying to make money from 9/11
The Truth movement brings a lot more to the table regarding all aspects, than those who labelled people as `Truthers` whom have the ability to think
for themselves. Instead of tarring with the `Anyone who disbelieves the OS is obviously a sandwich short of a picnic brush`, put your case forward by
supplying 100% evidence enforcing the OS, the best way of strengthening any case for, and thus getting a point over is beating the other guy with
superior evidence, facts, reliable sources, but here, as is the norm, just doesn`t happen, ask yourself why?.
Except there are no "professional research orginisations" inside the truth movement - if there are, care to name them?
The real professional orginisations totally ignore the silly truth movement
I find this reply outstanding, here we have you - a staunch believer of fables, supporting with blind faith those responsible whose whole statements
depicting the event, is structured around - disregarding science, physics, 503 1st responders testimonies, involving 20,000+ pages detailing
completely overlooked aspects, which heavily contradict the OS, and so much more.
So, a challenge for you, bring here the irrefutable proof that makes anyone whom does not believe the OS, is obviously suffering from mental problems,
as the case for, must surely have concrete evidence enforcing it to such a status as to why people like me, whom completely disagree with the OS are
But then again, you strike me as the sort of person that labels the B.B.C. report regarding the collapse of WTC7 22 minutes prematurely, as just
another newsreader goof.