Scientists discover the secret of ageing, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 35 times
Topic started on 16-2-2010 @ 12:17 PM by Frogs
The secret of what makes our cells age has apparently been discovered by a team in the UK.

Scientists discover the secret of ageing

The research, published by the journal Molecular Systems Biology, shows that when an ageing cell detects serious damage to its DNA – caused by the wear and tear of life – it sends out specific internal signals.

These distress signals trigger the cell’s mitochondria, its tiny energy-producing power packs, to make oxidising “free radical” molecules, which in turn tell the cell either to destroy itself or to stop dividing. The aim is to avoid the damaged DNA that causes cancer.


The fountain of youth is still a long way away. However, I find the last bit of this fascinating. If I'm reading this right, aging is apparently one of the body's ways of stopping cancer by destroying or shutting down damaged cells.


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 12:54 PM by Frogs
reply to post by SaturnFX


You raise some good points there. Population vs. available resources all the way down to "Honey, if I put my nose to the grindstone I might get the boss' job by the time I'm 350!!"

It is great to dream of increased lifespans - but as you mention it does bring out a host of issues.


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 03:02 PM by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by SaturnFX


Just wondering if all the "rules" were put in place, and the elder people were essentially banished to another planet, then what's the point in wanting to achieve a long life? So you can get out of the way; make way---for the youngsters under 100?

If this should turn out to be the case it would be rather pointless to even want to live past 100.

Just saying.



reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 03:18 PM by SaturnFX
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by SaturnFX


Just wondering if all the "rules" were put in place, and the elder people were essentially banished to another planet, then what's the point in wanting to achieve a long life? So you can get out of the way; make way---for the youngsters under 100?

If this should turn out to be the case it would be rather pointless to even want to live past 100.

Just saying.


The point would be to continue living...the reason why once you pass the first grade in school, you dont stick around. It takes up deskspace, and its time for you to get going.

Elders would have to leave and go...somewhere that didnt effect a massive strain on the resources. Thats simply how it is, and at the moment, we have no real solution for it...however that may change in 10 years as we probe more and more alternative energy solutions. (energy is key here)


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 03:22 PM by SaturnFX
reply to post by DevolutionEvolvd


The science itself is rather old...glad to see they are having more breakthroughs

What sort of took me back was how they downplayed the telomeres role. My biology understanding is that even if we were to make a way for everyone to look 18 years old their entire lifetime, once you hit about 125, there are no more telomeres to shrink and the body in essence starts a full system shutdown. This has been one of the questionmark obsticles when even pondering longevity in a biological aspect.

I am reading doubletalk in this article. most people have no concept of the telomere issue and so wont question their hypothesis...I smell a rat.


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 03:31 PM by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by SaturnFX


Again, I can't imagine anyone who would want to continue living while being considered nothing more than a strain on resources to the point that it was "time to go". Struggling for long life, only to have it then become an undesirable, banishable condition?

Sorry, this doesn't make any sense. Perhaps by the time anything like this would happen, humans would be evolved enough to come up with a better plan, which would still include equality for all.


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 03:38 PM by SaturnFX
reply to post by ladyinwaiting


Who said anything about undesirable condition? hell, I imagine the environment you go to after the tipping point age would be far better kept than the earthspace that is home to grumpy teens, kids funlands everywhere, angst ridden violent 20-30 year olds, etc...

with age comes wisdom, and a desire to not break stuff because it looks cool when you break it.

frankly, if lets say, the moon, or mars was colonised by the over 100 crowd, it might be a flipping eutopia that is longed for by the under 100s (sure, they can come visit, but no sticking around for months on end!)

Your thinking of the move as some negative bucket on the head and tied backward to a horse banishment...think of it more as a graduation.


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 03:42 PM by SaturnFX
reply to post by ladyinwaiting


Followup comment.

Initially, it will be in the interest of most elitists to actually put undesirable traits on longevity, from God didnt want it, to other sociological memes to lessen the amount of people that would initially extend until the the resources issues were resolved.



reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 03:42 PM by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by SaturnFX


Nah, I don't think so. You can think of it that way if you like, but I don't like people making decisions like that for me. Even the fantasy 250 year old me. lol.

But I will say Mr. SaturnFX, I'm glad you won't be in charge. Old people can be irritable and impatient. I don't think you would last long.


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 03:50 PM by SaturnFX
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by SaturnFX


Nah, I don't think so. You can think of it that way if you like, but I don't like people making decisions like that for me. Even the fantasy 250 year old me. lol.

But I will say Mr. SaturnFX, I'm glad you won't be in charge. Old people can be irritable and impatient. I don't think you would last long.


People like me are rarely in charge...hense why technology is continously suppressed...because people want everything but will give up nothing or even discuss changing beforehand...therefore, no tech for anyone.

Can you imagine a world where in a few hundred years, the population would go from 7 billion to about 40 billion because people simply stopped dying?

Either you make concessions for it and plan ahead, accept it will never happen even when it could, or accept the extinction level event that it will cause by releasing tech without planning. Which one are you arguing for, because clearly you dont want to plan for it.


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 04:03 PM by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by SaturnFX


No, I just don't want you to plan for it.

[edit on 2/16/2010 by ladyinwaiting]


reply posted on 16-2-2010 @ 04:18 PM by SaturnFX
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by SaturnFX


No, I just don't want you to plan for it.

[edit on 2/16/2010 by ladyinwaiting]


If you can suggest a alternative viable plan, then be my guest, but simply saying plan A doesn't work witout suggesting a plan B that has equal promise is not adding to a conversation, its actually just being a luddie.

My suggestion is to give a age based alternative. you want the treatment, then you become sterile and stop sucking up the resources of the planet after a certain age...or dont take the treatment and die with the rest of the schmuck...your choice.

now your turn...go.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



First Heartless Man - You Don\'t Really Need A Heart or A Pulse
  Posted 6 days ago with 51 member flags
Doctor Uses Coconut Oil to Reverse Husband\'s Alzheimer\'s Disease
  Posted 11 days ago with 28 member flags
A brief look at water fluoridation and the insanity of it
  Posted 9 days ago with 28 member flags
Brains of Addicts Are Inherently Abnormal
  Posted 5 days ago with 20 member flags
FDA say body is a drug and has the right to regulate it!
  Posted 8 days ago with 18 member flags
MPD/DID and Quantum Psychiatry
  Posted 12 days ago with 12 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 10 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 6 hours ago, 49 replies