It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It looks like a shape charge to me but I say that with a caveat I haven't examined it in detail yet. Could you post a large or close-up of the damage ring, from the inside?
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
My opinion on it: it makes sense,
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
there needed to be an exit into open air both for placing or removing of various airplane and missile parts, respectively,
Just that landing gear and wheel. How much do you think it weighs?
Originally posted by saturnsrings
reply to post by seism
There are also people that swear that it was a small plane that flew over too. A cruise missile could easily be mistaken for a small plane. We can't discount their
testimony either. There were also people that said they could smell cordite.
I just can't get passed the exit hole. It's, to me at least too perfect to be an exit hole from a passenger plane. That and where were the holes the engines should have left?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by Reheat
Reheat that's an interesting observation. I wasn't aware there were only two major groups left still sticking to the no plane at pentagon claim, but I can certainly understand why. All the evidence seems consistent with a plane to me but even setting aside the evidence, nobody has explained to me why, even if it was an inside job by TPTB, they still wouldn't just crash the plane into the pentagon. The whole premise that it wasn't a plane and then they tried to fool us into thinking it was a plane has never made any sense to me even from a conspiracy angle. I don't see any motive to do anything but crash the plane if they wanted us to think it was a plane crash. I don't know if that's why the other folks have abandoned the idea or not, but that's a big question that puzzles me.
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by saturnsrings
reply to post by seism
There are also people that swear that it was a small plane that flew over too. A cruise missile could easily be mistaken for a small plane. We can't discount their
testimony either. There were also people that said they could smell cordite.
I just can't get passed the exit hole. It's, to me at least too perfect to be an exit hole from a passenger plane. That and where were the holes the engines should have left?
Out of scores of witnesses only 2 thought they saw a small corporate jet and none saw a missile :-
911research.wtc7.net...
I cannot imagine what would be the relevance of anyone saying they smelt cordite. Cordite is an obsolete British propellant and would have nothing to do with a 2001 US missile.
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by Reheat
I haven't even seen a mole hill yet, much less a mountain.
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by Reheat
Yeah, you'll need to wash your hair or pick belly lint too before you'll rationally discuss the circular hole in the reinforced, poured-in-place, load-bearing, shear, double brick-lined wall of the C-Ring lightwell.
Originally posted by 911files
Jerry Henson - page 9
Read Henson's account. The hole was in his office wall. Seeing as how he almost died, I'm not sure why he would lie about it.