Originally posted by waypastvne

Originally posted by prumplymromblex
pull off those manuevers, those tight turns at low altitude and high bank angles

When and where did this happen ?

Exactly how tight were the turns ?

Exactly how steep were the bank angles ?

At what altitude were these turns made ?

You made the claim, now give us some numbers Truther.

Typical misinformation leads to erroneous conclusions.

There were no tight turns.
The steepest bank angle was about 35-40 degrees at the beginning of the turn to lose altitude.
This turn was at about 7,000' as I recall.
NO DIFFICULT MANEUVERS were performed. The FDR shows that all of the maneuvering was done by a neophyte pilot very sloppily, barely maintaining control. He was simply just hanging on....

"This was obviously placed to "help the case" of the original story"


prove it

Originally posted by Reheat
The FDR shows that all of the maneuvering was done by a neophyte pilot very sloppily, barely maintaining control. He was simply just hanging on....

If you seem to have read the FDR info so well can you explain why the airplane never stopped at the named Gate at Dulles? It's sort of a deal breaker there.... so-called terrorists allegedly hijacked a plane ... but... it was never at the Gate

Originally posted by Thermo Klein

Originally posted by Reheat
The FDR shows that all of the maneuvering was done by a neophyte pilot very sloppily, barely maintaining control. He was simply just hanging on....

If you seem to have read the FDR info so well can you explain why the airplane never stopped at the named Gate at Dulles? It's sort of a deal breaker there.... so-called terrorists allegedly hijacked a plane ... but... it was never at the Gate

You again?

You believe everything you read from frauds on one of the most discredited sites on the internet, do you? Even the majority of "truther" groups reject the crap coming from that site, but you swallow it hook line and sinker.

it doesn't matter how many months go by.... if I post on this thread it is ALWAYS a matter of a few minutes that at least two or three of you five truthers respond

You guys get email alerts? hope I didn't interrupt your lunch break


I think I'll pass on such an open invitation of a single Pf9/11t (??) that panned out...

Originally posted by Thermo Klein
I think I'll pass on such an open invitation of a single Pf9/11t (??) that panned out...

Of course, you will pass because there aren't any. You wouldn't know the difference if there were any in the first place. All you can do is parrot "Polly want a cracker".

Originally posted by trebor451
I could go on.....

Aside from that, they're doing a bang up job.

Don't forget "Radar shows UA 93 still airborne after crash" when Herndon DOES NOT have radar in the building. There's more, but I can't be bothered now...

Originally posted by Reheat

Originally posted by trebor451
I could go on.....

Aside from that, they're doing a bang up job.

Don't forget "Radar shows UA 93 still airborne after crash" when Herndon DOES NOT have radar in the building. There's more, but I can't be bothered now...

Its a clown car full of stupidity. I left out everything PfT did for that absolutely hilarious April Gallop case - the "affidavit" in support, the statements from "professional" pilots, all backing the lawsuit that claimed “surface to air missiles” were not used at the Pentagon when there haven’t *been* any surface to air missiles at the Pentagon…ever…before 9/11 filed by someone who had sued American Airlines for damage from the airplane (and accepted a settlement from them)…and then sued Dick Cheney claiming there wasn’t an airplane. Anyone with a rational mind would have looked at that whole thing and said "No way!".

Then of course there are the dozens and dozens and dozens and dozens of aircraft, pilot, flight crew or maintenance unions, organizations or associations out there, worldwide, and not a single one of them have come to support "Capt" Bob and his merry troupe of aeronautical idiots. Wonder why?

Faster. Funnier. Please.