Mhmm, well here it is...
You can argue with your political talking heads as much as you want, you can say that someone nerfed some numbers presented in a journal...but you
know what...statistics are bipartisan.
The process and problem of climate destablization has almost very little to do with how the weather is in your backyard...it has everything...let me
repeat -everything- to do with the ocean temp.
I wont go into why its important to have a cool and stable ocean temperature...if you truely need to know, then I recommend picking up any 8th grade
science textbook and go through some lessons...but the short of it is...the ocean is the engine for our environment...if we break the engine, the rest
of the whole life stuff as we exist today...wont work so well.
Anyhow, onto the facts and stats.
in reality, only a single diagram need be shown here. Its a simple diagram progressing the ocean temp and landmass temp over the past 100+ years on
earth. They make no political stances, they do not support or reject the philosophies of any POTUS, Prime Minister, or religion...they simply are
what is.
Link to NASA source
Line plot of global mean land-ocean temperature index, 1880 to present, with the base period 1951-1980. The dotted black line is the annual mean and
the solid red line is the five-year mean. The green bars show uncertainty estimates
ok, as we see here, a nice and steady increase in the ocean temp. See also how it has a very nice upswing to it within the last 50 years.
So, I guess the final question is...Whom do you wish to believe...scientists, machines that measure temperatures unbiasly, and common sense...or
corporate sponsored politicians/pundants and a couple guys from germany whom do not even understand how a standard greenhouse works.
The corporations whom purchased some politicians (arguably a entire party) have zero facts to back them and only basic catch phrases. They rely on
misusing words, spreading disinformation, and other means so not to be regulated (will regulations even work is a valid question however...personally,
I think its using a eyedropper to stop a forest fire...but thats a different subject to begin with).
Why any thinking person would trust their lives and the life of the entire planet into corporation whom would have a vested interest in supressing
and/or ridiculing such information is beyond me...the simple fact however is that there are still many people whom are corporate lead talkboxes..
Luckily statistics dont lie (interpretations do however...and that has been used by both sides).
Anyhow, discuss...and if there is credible evidence dismissing these stats, then post them. The only thing more damning in ignoring facts is
supressing facts...remember also, interpretations of statistics are not facts...they are simply skewed versions of what people want the stats to mean
verses what it actually means..so no opinions, no "one guy said it wasnt possible" quotes...actual verifiable hard stats...let the people make up
their mind verses told what to think (personally, one quick view tells me all I need to know)