It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
reply to post by LightFantastic
So what you are telling us is that you did all this testing, but have nothing to show for it. No data, no documents, no footage, nothing. Absolutely zero evidence or proof of your claims.
Isn't that what people usually accuse the inventors of?
Originally posted by LightFantastic
I don't need to back up my claims.
If any of the known devices worked as claimed I'm pretty sure the device and its inventor would be pretty famous.
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
Famous, like John Bedini is?
Originally posted by LightFantastic
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
Famous, like John Bedini is?
I woudn't call him famous at all. Infamous would be much too strong as well.
Feel free to build a system and I will come and test it under my usual terms: No charge if it is OU.
No, no NDAs as far as the testing and measurement data is concerned, or my offer to contribute funds is off. If the inventor wants an NDA to protect his or her schematics and intellectual property, fine.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
No NDA prior to patent = no deal on anything patentable. Sorry, but that's a deal-breaker.
The true Hz figure is 91, not 182, which was a double count from the counter.
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
reply to post by LightFantastic
Only if you agree to do all the tests and take all the measurements on camera for the whole world to see, so that you can't later fudge the data or weasel out of it.
Be prepared to state your real name, background, education, and qualifications on camera. And be prepared to have entire teams of debunkers and gang-stalkers throw everything but the kitchen sink at you in order to try to discredit you.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
reply to post by MajorDisaster
NDA's are sacred. I would be extremely concerned if LightFantastic were to disclose any information he was contractually obligated to hold private.
LightFantastic: is that an open, standing offer? And what are your fees?
TheRedneck
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Don't want to be in direct competition with you, but I also want to make an offer Here it is:
I won't charge any money for the construction and testing of the prototype -- which I will undertake only if I deem the device viable -- but I need to be listed as a co-author of a publication in a major peer-reviewed physics journal. I'm an experienced science writer, so I'm willing to make the effort to write it up as well.
Originally posted by expat2368
Anyone who develops a true overunity device and attempts to patent it, in my humble opinion will either have their patent seized due to "national security" or be "eliminated".
Too many people, governments, and corporations have too much to lose to allow such a device to get out.
Originally posted by LightFantastic
Haha bhudda. I didn't think you would have the time for OU . However, getting published in a worthwhile journal would require the help of a current and already published physicist.
Most of these devices have a lot of work in their construction, I gave up replicating them ages ago.
Originally posted by LightFantastic
"Fudge the data or weasel out of it?" I take offence to your insinuations.
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
Rumor has it John Bedini once had a whole team of German engineers in, and they verified that his system works - but then they "weaseled out". They were afraid to publish their results for fear of being ridiculed by the scientific community.