 |
|
Topic started on 24-5-2004 @ 03:51 AM by StarChild
|
Which unit do you think is more capable of handling CT operations, and Hostage Rescue?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I want opinions here. Provide accurate information verifying your claims, and links to support.
Mr. M
[Edited on 24-5-2004 by StarChild]
[Edited on 24-5-2004 by StarChild]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 08:02 AM by StarChild
|
DEVGRU
Much of what DEVGRU, or the Naval Special Warfare Development Group, is and does remains classified and unknown. What is know is that they were formed
in the mid 1990's after SEAL Team Six, the Navy's Counter-terrorism was disbanded. DEVGRU was created after Richard Marcinko, the original commander
of ST6 published a series of books that outlined the history and purpose of the original Team. According to the US Navy, DEVGRU was formed to create,
test, and evaluate new tactics, weapons, and equipment.
However, with the disbanding of ST 6 the Navy was left without a maritime CT unit, although SEAL Team 8 was tasked with maritime deployments and
takedowns. Recent rumors have appear to confirm that DEVGRU is actually a CT unit created (although current officers will deny its existance) to
replace the lime-light stricken ST6. This is born out, in no small significance, buy the structure surroundind DEVGRU. While under the command of
NAVSPECWARGRU (Navy Special Warfare Group, DEVGRU is also a component of JSOC, with other such units as the US Army's 1st SFOD-D and 160th Special
Operations Aviation Regiment, both units that list counter-terrorism in their promary activities.
www.specwarnet.com...
SFOD-D
The U.S. Army’s 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta (SFOD-D) is one of two of the U.S. government’s principle unit tasked with
counterterrorist operations outside the United States (the other being Naval Special Warfare Development Group). Delta Force was created by U.S. Army
colonel Charles Beckwith in 1977 in direct response to numerous, well-publicized terrorist incidents that occurred in the 1970s. From its beginnings,
Delta was heavily influenced by the British SAS, a philosophical result of Col. Beckwith’s year-long (1962-1963) exchange tour with that unit.
Accordingly, it is today organized into three operating squadrons, all of which (A, B, and C) are subdivided into small groups known as troops. It is
rumored that each troop, as the case with the SAS, specializes in HALO, SCUBA, or other skill groups. These troops can each be further divided into
smaller units as needed to fit mission requirements. Delta also maintains support units which handle selection and training, logistics, finance, and
the unit’s medical requirements. Within this grouping is a little known, but vital technical unit which is responsible for covert eavesdropping
equipment for use in hostage rescues and similar situations.
The unit is headquartered in a remote section of the U.S. Army’s sprawling Fort Bragg, North Carolina. Reports of the compound indicate that no
expense has been spared, including numerous shooting facilities (both for close quarters battle and longer range sniping), an Olympic-sized swimming
pool, dive tank, and a three-story climbing wall. Yet, as lavish as these accouterments may seem, they all serve vital roles in training
counterterrorists. As units such as Delta do not get to choose when and where they will be needed. As such, they must train for any eventuality. These
skills are enhanced by the unit's participation in an ongoing exchange and training programs with foreign counterterrorist units, such as (as might
be expected) Britain's 22 SAS, France's GIGN, Germany's GSG-9, Israel's Sayeret Matkal/Unit 269, and Australia's own Special Air Service
Regiment. Such close cooperation with other groups provides innumerable benefits, including exchanges of new tactics and equipment as well as
enhancing relations that might prove useful in later real-world operations.
Delta troopers are also equipped with the most advanced weaponry and equipment available in the U.S. special operations arsenal. A significant portion
of their gear is highly customized and cannot be found anywhere but in Delta’s lockers. An early example of this was a specially-constructed HAHO
parachute rig which were been adapted to permit jumpers to keep their hands at their sides during the descent rather than above their heads. This
alteration prevents the loss of functioning which can occur as a result of prolonged flight time in such an unnatural position.
www.specialoperations.com...
Mr. M
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 08:44 AM by devilwasp
|
wow nice find
i would say that SFOD-D would be my choice for hostage rescue and DEVGRU for CT
with SFOD-D having the exsperience of cross training with most hostage rescue forces around the globe would be my first choice
DEVGRU i would pick for CT because they get new equipment and since there wont be no hostages what a better place to test them in a freindly free zone
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-5-2004 @ 10:18 AM by StarChild
|
Originally posted by devilwasp
wow nice find
i would say that SFOD-D would be my choice for hostage rescue and DEVGRU for CT
with SFOD-D having the exsperience of cross training with most hostage rescue forces around the globe would be my first choice
DEVGRU i would pick for CT because they get new equipment and since there wont be no hostages what a better place to test them in a freindly free zone

DEVGRU for CT because of their equipment? Why? They get the same equipment Delta does. And what are you talking about when you say a "friendly
free zone"? Do you not trust DEVGRU to handle hostage rescue missions?
Mr. M
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-5-2004 @ 10:28 AM by Transc3ndent
|
It's not very connected to the subject of this thread, but I just wanted to ask why the US military/government decided to continue with SFOD-D and
not Blue Light?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-5-2004 @ 12:10 PM by devilwasp
|
well u said that they feild test new eqipment and tactics
what would happen if something went wrong or failed
if they used it in hostage rescue then your tkaing a bigger risk than using tactics and equipment that work.
if u use it in CT then you can see if these tactics will work and you wont get any freindlies aka civies/hostages hurt
i would rather use the teste methods than new untested equipment
[Edited on 25-5-2004 by devilwasp]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2004 @ 06:15 AM by StarChild
|
Originally posted by Transc3ndent
It's not very connected to the subject of this thread, but I just wanted to ask why the US military/government decided to continue with SFOD-D and
not Blue Light? 
If you know about Blue Light, then you should know why it was "converted".
Mr. M
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2004 @ 06:17 AM by StarChild
|
Devilwasp, do you honestly have any idea what DEVGRU does, or are you just speculating? It doesn't sound to me like you are too familiar with this
particular unit.
Mr. M
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2004 @ 07:15 AM by Transc3ndent
|
Originally posted by StarChild
Originally posted by Transc3ndent
It's not very connected to the subject of this thread, but I just wanted to ask why the US military/government decided to continue with SFOD-D and
not Blue Light? 
If you know about Blue Light, then you should know why it was "converted".
Mr. M 
Actually I read about Blue Light somewhere, searched for it on google, found it has something to do with the history of SFOD-D, and that SFOD-D
remained to be active while Blue Light ceased to exist, but I didn't find out why.
That's why I'm asking.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2004 @ 07:39 AM by DeltaNine
|
Alright, I'll bite.
Neither of them.
Thats right. I can't say which until a specific situation is mentioned.
Is it on water? IE a Rig. DEVGRU.
Is it on an aircraft. CAG (If not because I don't beleive DEVGRU do as much work with A/C than CAG/Delta/KFC/whatever do. Just don't quote me on
that).
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2004 @ 12:04 PM by elmariachi
|
Both are highly capable units.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2004 @ 12:12 PM by devilwasp
|
Originally posted by StarChild
Devilwasp, do you honestly have any idea what DEVGRU does, or are you just speculating? It doesn't sound to me like you are too familiar with this
particular unit.
Mr. M 
im not very familiar with US SF's only the famous ones i know
im just using the info i was given if u think its wrong thats ur call but i stick wi ma choice
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-10-2007 @ 12:44 AM by mister2
|
Both are only as good as a human being can be trained. SAS are the best. Then the D boys and SEALS. The navy guys I met were typically younger and
more physically capable but also they were a bit on the immature side (25 yr olds vs 40 yr olds).
The equipment is all cutting edge. We would get "new stuff" at the Sig Det that was actually something that Delta had been using for two years.
If you want to know more - they are accepting applications.
Mike
former SigDet cdr
5th SFG(A)
1998-2001
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-10-2007 @ 01:20 PM by BlueRaja
|
They cross train with each other, and frequently operate jointly, so I don't think you can really say in all cases A is better than B. They use the
same equipment and techniques, and they both fire a lot of ammunition, so their shooters are highly skilled in CT, hostage rescue, etc...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-10-2007 @ 01:41 PM by Tom Bedlam
|
It's actually SFOD-E.
They design the stuff that D gets.
It's said that the Echo group trained Chuck Norris.
Steven Hawking was a junior Echo in SFOD-E before his unfortunate parachute accident. He was able to break his fall with the power of his mind, just
not quite enough.
And they're four letters better than those -A pikers.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-5-2008 @ 06:21 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-5-2008 @ 06:28 PM by jerico65
|
Originally posted by Tom Bedlam
It's said that the Echo group trained Chuck Norris. 
You're wrong. Chuck Norris trained them!!!!
And Hawking was the Senior Echo who tried to catch a flying RPG with his teeth.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-6-2008 @ 12:01 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
I'm a former civilian employee of DEVGRU. You have NO IDEA how well trained they are. They expend more ammunition in training in one year than the
entire U. S. Marine Corps does. They keep up their skills at MANY training sites INCONUS and overseas. They do, it fact train with Delta and other
SF units. They have many missions other than just "plain ol CT", but we can't get into that here...
:-X
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |