Auschwitz officially changed their Holocaust number from 4 million to 1 million Jews murdered. Holocaust exterminationists like to call Holocaust
deniers "revisionists" as if a historical event is ever 100 percent absolutely known and therefore history can never be revisited or revised. And
yet, the official story of the holocaust is continually revised and edited, as in this example. erichunt.net...
Here are some more videos about the Holocaust
Keep in mind that in certain European countries, it is actually illegal to deny the holocaust. Video of David Irving speeches goes into detail about
his alleged crime of holocaust denial (even though he is not a holocaust denier). In the video, found on youtube, he says that the judge could not
even repeat the crime he committed, because then the judge would also be guilty of the crime of holocaust denial (fast forward to about 8:00):
The main reason why holocaust denial is looked down upon with scorn is because it is an insult to those who have actually been oppressed by the
holocaust, yet they never offer any type of compassion to the German people who are still being held on trial for holocaust war crimes.
Demjanjuk was actually found innocent of war crimes by an Israeli court, and lived in Cleveland, Ohio until he was later deported to Germany. He is
charged with the crime of murdering 250,000 Jews. There is no evidence of course of his crime, only eye witness testimony. If you research some of the
holocaust denial videos, you will see an in depth analysis of some of these supposed eye-witness accounts.
Another reason why holocaust denial is looked on with scorn is a reason I find quite ridiculous, that it will prop up Hitlerism, but this is false, if
anything props up Hitler, it is the story of Nazi brutality. World War 2 was thought of as the "good fight" against Nazism, and so the holocaust
myth builds up the militarism around the world, giving it an excuse so long as the "good" guys are fighting the "bad" guys.
One final remark on the "rise of Hitlerism" is that no one denies that Hitler was a dictator, and yet Hitler seems to dwarf Stalin in comparison
because of the holocaust story, even though Stalin was just as brutal of a dictator. If people really wanted to put the rise of Hitlerism to rest,
they would stop using the term "Hilter" as a standard phrase to call one's enemy you do not like.
And you can see how the holocaust story is protected today, through the use of courts to silence all opposition to the official story. The real
revisionists of the holocaust try to silence their critics in an Orwellian and fascist manner, and yet claim to be protecting the innocent and
intolerant of fascism.
I am not a neo-nazi, nor am I a holocaust "denier" since even the so called holocaust deniers are not really deniers. I prefer the term holocaust
diminisher, since I do not deny that there were camps, but they were mostly war prisons and not death camps.