It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by jthomas
Utter nonsense.
You do not need individual serial numbers to identify a known aircraft. ALL of the evidence already demonstrates that AA77, a Boeing 757, hit the Pentagon.
You are right, utter nonsense since 9/11 is a criminal investigation so the aircraft do need to be identified.
Originally posted by REMISNE
I have shown reasonable doubt because there are no photos of ALL the parts with reports that match AA77. Per U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, all federally registered civil aircraft are to contain uniquely numbered components.
Also no reports of where the parts are now.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by Alfie1
In order to establish a reasonable doubt, in relation to plane parts at the Pentagon, do you not have to demonstrate that there was at least one part recovered incompatible with a Boeing 757.
Can you do that please ?
I have shown reasonable doubt because there are no photos of ALL the parts with reports that match AA77.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
the insurance companies are satisfied, our investigative agencies are wholly satisfied that the plane involved in AA77 hit the Pentagon on 9/11/2001.
Please show me the insurance company records that the airlines collected hull or hijack insurance for AA77.
I will be wating for the information.
Per U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, all federally registered civil aircraft are to contain uniquely numbered components.
Originally posted by REMISNE
All i have to do is prove reasonable doubt that the official story is wrong, which i have proven many times.
Originally posted by 911files
That is one photo, already posted in this thread. I did not assert that was all that there was and again, you will have to take that up with the FBI.
You have never in your wildest dreams proven anything wrong. You have never offered evidence of any kind on any thread I have ever seen on any forum. All you have ever posted was a letter stating that the NSA was working on a search of records responsive to your request, but never the actual FOIA results. You sir, are simply a troll.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Again, what does that photo prove?
If that is just one photo and it is not proof, then why did you post it?
Where are the other photos that you base this all on?
Originally posted by jthomas
Now, apologize to everyone here for forgetting your schooling, Lillydale.
Originally posted by Lillydale
You are just making things up and acting indignant because it is the only option you have. Proving it will never happen so instead you pretend to be upset at me for asking. Tsk tsk. So, the debunker's new best weapon is to just shut the other side up instead of refute what they say with facts and evidence?
Originally posted by 911files
Lillydale, you have completely lost your mind. Here is a thread that is extending quite a few pages now and the only people presenting any evidence what-so-ever is me and a few other folks in regards to the OP. I have not seen one shred of evidence to the contrary presented by you or the NSA security guard, just rhetoric.
So please, stop the tsk, tsk because so far you have put up nothing...nada...zip...
You asked the OP question, and it was answered (with evidence I might add). Sorry if you didn't like the answer.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Please, find a link to this alleged "U.S. Code of Federal Regulations" (if that is its REAL name).
Or, this is just something you made up, maybe?
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Please, find a link to this alleged "U.S. Code of Federal Regulations" (if that is its REAL name).
Or, this is just something you made up, maybe?
Here you go! Code of Federal Regulations
It seems a real pilot would have known that. Hmmmm.....
F.B.I. Counsel: No Attempt Made By F.B.I. To Formally Identify 9/11 Plane Wreckage
Originally posted by impressme
Wow, five posters ganging up on one, talk about teamwork. You people should be ashamed of yourselves not only did Lillydale prove you are all wrong, but Lillydale proved you guys are so desperate that you decided to make up BS.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by jthomas
Now, apologize to everyone here for forgetting your schooling, Lillydale.
I am sorry but can you please show me which parts of AA77's wings we are looking at and how you know it came from the wings of AA77? Thanks.
edit to add: and if not, then do I get an apology from you?
[edit on 12/29/09 by Lillydale]
Originally posted by jthomas
You mean to say that you could not identify the debris in the photo just by looking at that photo so, yes, you owe us an apology.
You mean to say that you could not identify the debris in the photo just by looking at that photo so, yes, you owe us an apology.