It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The energy requirements for nano-factories are negligible. I estimate that molecular manufacturing will be an energy generator rather than an energy consumer. A molecular manufacturing process can be driven by the chemical energy content of the feedstock matrerials, producing electrical energy as a by-product (if only to reduce the heat dissipation burden) using typical organic feedstock, and assuming oxidation of surplus hydrogen, reasonably efficient molecular manufacturing processes are net energy producers. -Drexler, Nanosystems.
Manufacturing using molecular nanotechnology fabrication will also be far more energy efficient than contemporary manufacturing, which moves bulk materials from place to place in a relatively wasteful manner. - Ray Kurzweil
Nature shows that molecules can serve as machines cause living things work by means of such machinery. Enzymes are molecular machines that make, break, and rearrange the bonds holding other molecules together. Muscles are driven by molecular machines that haul fiber past one another. DNA serves as a data-storage system, transmitting digital instructions to molecular machines. The ribosomes, that manufacture protein molecules. And these protein molecules, in turn, make up most of the molecular machinery.- Drexler
University researchers have invented what they believe is the first "bionic chip" -- part living tissue, part machine -- in which a biological cell is part of the actual electronic circuitry. The new chip gives scientists something they long have sought: an "open sesame" tool to get safely inside fragile, living cells at the touch of a button.
Here's a conceptually simple proposal to overcome all biological pathogens. With the advent of full-scale nanotechnology in the 2020s we will have the potential to replace biology's genetic-information repository in the cell nucleus with a nano-engineered system that would maintain the genetic code and simulate the actions of RNA, the ribosome, and other elements of the computer in biology's assembler. A nano-computer would maintain the genetic code and implement the gene-expression algorithms. A nanobot would then construct the amino-acid sequences for the expressed genes.
- Ray Kurweil
Evolution, the process that produced humanity, possesses only one goal: create gene machines maximally capable of producing copies of themselves. In retrospect, this is the only way complex structures such as life could possibly arise in an unintelligent universe. But this goal often comes into conflict with human interests, causing death, suffering, and short life spans. The past progress of humanity has been a history of shattering evolutionary constraints.
-Michael Anissimov
Claytronics -
These are objects and materials that will display qualities of both solids and liquids. Objects created with this type of material will be able to change shape or morph, on the go. On top of that these materials will be self-healing.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
Very interesting thread indeed
A very interesting part of your OP that I found intriguing was this paragraph.
Claytronics -
These are objects and materials that will display qualities of both solids and liquids. Objects created with this type of material will be able to change shape or morph, on the go. On top of that these materials will be self-healing.
Would this type of 'technology' be able to change the appearance of a human being? i.e nano cells that can effect that structure of cells in a human body?
Edit:
I thought it was apt to say that this paragraph should be changed to
4. PROTECTING OURSELVES.
Nanotech will give TPTB the ability to dominate the world from the molecular level. THEY will greatly increasing the power in human hands. THEY will be able to create more than THEY could ever have imagined, and be able to destroy more than we think. It is essential that we proceed down this path with caution. There have been many proposals put forth for protecting humanity.
[edit on 7-12-2009 by franspeakfree]
Originally posted by jokei
Again, great thread - I'd also love to see this garner more attention.
A couple of questions, as you seem to be pretty clued-up.
1) What are you thinking of a realistic delivery date for nano-tech, consumer/private market.
2) Obviously the "private" market will be way ahead of the public one - what, realistically are we going to be looking at by way of this tech being used against the populace.
3) I read ages ago about "rogue" nanotech, ie: if a bot is built to self-replicate and carries on indefinitely/exponentially it will get to a certain point where the nanobots have enough mass to collapse the planet... likelihood?
Sorry if these questions seem a little scatty, I'm trying to do a 100 things at once.