reply to post by HotSauce
repeating the same thing you have said before doesn't make it any truer.
it is the same cookier cutter response on ats.
And you have conveinantly ignored my response.
This person signed up to work for an EOE. He did not have to. He accepted to work for a company that had tolerance orders. He chose to ignore them.
This has nothing to do with restrictions of freedom of speech. And drama is unbecoming of a grown adult.
Does that meant the secret service agent who is not allowed to talk about their job is restricted from freedom of speech? Certainly. But they signed
up for it. Just like this boy.
don't like the company standards? Your have the freedom to work for whom you wish. he made the decision.
All the woman said was that she was getting married. It is legal in MA. When he didn't engage her in a discussion, she brought it up. Did she fish
him out? Certainly.
Not mature but also within HER rights to freedom of speech. It works both ways.
Did she say heterosexuals suck? No. She just said she was getting married.
he told her that her relationship was bad. That is slander. That is forcing a religious viewpoint.
And he should of left it at the church. If he couldn't handle her saying four times that she was gay, then the boy, will never make it anywhere if he
gets his feathers so easily ruffled.
|
