I'm not sure about what you're trying to say. Succinctly are you saying that we all behave contrary to some "primal intent" due to culturally
biased beliefs?
If so, what is this “primal intent”?
How can one as you say "clear our minds of all concepts so that afterwards we are able to build or continue to create more efficiently in respect of the original intent?"
You do realize that babies are weak and unlearned...right?
I do not see where lack of compassion has ever made anything better.
I think you misunderstood a lot of what I have said. I didnt even mention the consequences of my version of peace in a social scale. What I shared with you was a subjective understanding, one that works for individuals and not for groups. I mentioned that the world is our perspective of it. This world that Im talking about is not the absolute independent world that we can quantify and correlate with ecosystems, its the world that we experience, the world that is dependent on our existence.
But my point is mentioned by you. This world needs to CONSTANTLY end so that we attain what you call my version of peace. Im not talking about humanity here. Im talking about you and me.
I have no idea where you got the idea that we need to care about the weak. We need to care about our own personal peace (which if explored throughly would be understood that is directly related to the peace of whatever is around you), and that is it. And you know what? There is nothing more peaceful then death, so die and let die!
Hendrix once said: The world will know peace when the power of love is greater then the love for power.
I think you completely misunderstood what I wrote and I would like to ask you to read it again. I'm not at all advocating that we need save everyone. What I'm saying is quite the opposite actually, that we need only to save ourselves.