Originally posted by SLAYER69
I noticed they followed up at the tail end with this little tidbit.
Some critics of the global financial system have argued that SDRs are the thin end of the wedge to the creation of a world government, arguing
that institutions like the IMF and the G20 undermine the sovereignty of nations by taking control of economic policy out of the hands of national
leaders. Soros' comments are unlikely to assuage those concerns.
Ever since I read about the involvement of Soros and the IMF in the destabilization of Bosnia-Herzegovina, I have had profound reservations about the
motivations of either.
IMF does indeed undermine the sovereignty of nations, and by taking control of economic policy out of the hands of national leaders, especially in
Democratic or Republican nations, you are effectively taking that control out of the hands of the People and giving that control to the Elite few.
That is never a wise idea, and it is precisely what the Founding Fathers of the American people fought against.
However, I do agree that at some point America has to admit to itself that they are not the only world power, economically or otherwise. We cannot
dictate to the rest of the world how to conduct itself, and most of all, we have to stop trying to do such, especially under threat of economic or
military sanctions if we don't get our way.
Personally, I think there is much wisdom in a Laissaz-Faire attitude. Rather than have any agency or government be a New World Order, maybe it might
be in everyone's better interest if all the agencies and governments of the world stayed out of everyone else's internal affairs and recognized
sovereignty for what it is.