The Average ATS User, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 07:12 AM by jinx880101
reply to post by Republican08



You are so right, negative threads and posts that are full of attitude get a lot more attention than well thought out posts that actually mean something, I should know.

Then again, maybe my posts and threads are just crap and meaningless, maybe there should be an extra category for people who would rather be a loser than write a post screaming 'Skeptics you're ......' or 'Believers you're.......' Just for the flags, stars and attention.

Sometimes it feels like high school here.

[edit on 06/10/2009 by jinx880101]


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 07:34 AM by redoubt
reply to post by Republican08





The Average ATS User


You did neglect one in particular...

Type G – The stereotyper. This person assumes they are capable of categorizing the vast human dynamic into easy-to-understand, if not entirely simplistic groupings. They ignore the more complicated individual quantums, instead focusing on the few personality traits that they feel they can detect via the limited, electronic medium. From there, they smugly project their findings to those they have reduced, as if they had actually accomplished some great thing.

Nuff said.

[edit on 27-10-2009 by redoubt]



reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 07:59 AM by operation mindcrime
reply to post by Republican08



Dang, that's the last time i'm gonna ask you to elaborate

Guess i'm a typical type F.....

Peace


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 09:12 AM by IntastellaBurst
reply to post by jinx880101



haha, your so hard on yourself !!! Just be you kid, it is enough, it has always ..... been enough. Linea Dos !!!


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 11:52 PM by Republican08
Originally posted by redoubt
reply to
post by Republican08





The Average ATS User


You did neglect one in particular...

Type G – The stereotyper. This person assumes they are capable of categorizing the vast human dynamic into easy-to-understand, if not entirely simplistic groupings. They ignore the more complicated individual quantums, instead focusing on the few personality traits that they feel they can detect via the limited, electronic medium. From there, they smugly project their findings to those they have reduced, as if they had actually accomplished some great thing.

Nuff said.

[edit on 27-10-2009 by redoubt]


*Sigh*

I made a point in the OP, that you can't simplify, you guys are too serious.

Who did I reduce, most people responded saying they were a type A, which is a really great Type, and I agree with them, that's how i'd label them. A nice label, and this in no way affects your life.

I don't get you guys, at all, just come on here, and arrogantly attack people, then log off... geez
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Zombie Apocalypse is Real! And it\'s Here Now!
  Posted 15 days ago with 86 member flags
While Americans keep arguing about Trayvon-Zimmerman
  Posted 8 days ago with 79 member flags
The Suspicious Death of MI6 Agent Gareth Williams..
  Posted 18 days ago with 77 member flags
Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary
  Posted 10 days ago with 58 member flags
This is scary!
  Posted 15 days ago with 57 member flags