It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Oct. 21, 2009 -- Remember Ida, the fossil discovery announced last May with its own book and TV documentary? A publicity blitz called it "the link" that would reveal the earliest evolutionary roots of monkeys, apes and humans.
Experts protested that Ida wasn't even a close relative. And now a new analysis supports their reaction.
The new analysis says Darwinius does not belong in the same primate category as monkeys, apes and humans. Instead, the analysis concluded, it falls into the other major grouping, which includes lemurs.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
oh thanks man
I always knew it was croc
So who was the fool that posted the thread about the missing link anyhow?
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Some guys are going to use the possible misidentification as a stick to bang the creationist drum. Pffft. What else could they do? Others will seize on some 'scientists are bad, m'kay?' kind of schtick. Screw 'em all. The story shows that science is personified by the loud-mouthed 'know-all' with an ability to admit when he or she is wrong and change their mind.
Experts protested that Ida wasn't even a close relative. And now a new analysis supports their reaction.
Originally posted by RuneSpider
I think this is the important part here:
Experts protested that Ida wasn't even a close relative. And now a new analysis supports their reaction.
It was a glory seeking publication by the scientist.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
I always knew it was croc
So who was the fool that posted the thread about the missing link anyhow?
Originally posted by nixie_nox
No it is not a hoax. That is your interpretation. This is a really bad habit ATSers are developing, taking stories and spinning them.
They thought this was an ancestor, and others said it isn't. Plain and simple.
First of all, this story will probably change another five times, as they have to study the fossil. They study these fossils mm by mm. And compare and discuss and x-ray. Five months is not even remotely enough time to decide anything yet. So both camps could end up being wrong. Or one could be right. Not enough time has passed for either to decide.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
Sorry, didn't mean to come off sounding snarky.
Originally posted by Mind1universe
You depend on the system of bull#.
Is it any wonder your so lost.
You should try find out who runs the world, before you get so cocky. Yeah I'll give a hint. They were the survivors of Atlantis. Arrogance and ignorance is a trait that seems to blind us, it's blinding you right well.
Well you can call yourself an ape. However I know I'm not.
In fact, it confirms what most scientists think, said David Begun, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Toronto.