Originally posted by endisnighe
The technology seems to be real on the mathematical model. Using electrical energy produced by the alternator to convert straight water into an
amalgam of hydrogen and oxygen; also hydrogen and oxygen molecules of differing ionotic makeup(electron quantity) more power is created than is used.
I have witnessed, personally, the decrease in fuel(gasoline) consumption of 50% in standard internal combustion engines. Several inventors have stated
a 100% usage of water as a fuel. No need to go into their claims.
Water injection, as a direct increase in horsepower was used in ww2 era aircraft and is not even disputed by anyone. This increases the mass of the
airfuel mixture which directly increases power output. Basic engineering.
If you use the alternator to power a hydrogen electrolysis cell, the additional energy used by the engine to turn the alternator will be much more
than the additional energy gained from the hydrogen.
Water injection was used in ww2 (and current vehicles) to decrease the intake temperature giving giving more oxygen per unit volume, allowing for a
greater power output. An intercooler provides the same effect.
I have personally run small petrol engines on a mixture of petrol and water with up to 40% water. A drop of washing up liquid is required to get a
mix. I didn't measure the performance difference unfortunately but the mixed tank ran for approx the same time at the same RPM as the 100% petrol
test. The timing had to be altered however.