Originally posted by CaptainAmerica2012

Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force, aircraft accident investigator ~ "I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident...

Now that's interesting. I've never heard of an aircraft accident investigator who couldn't figure out the precise cause of a plane crash after it had been hijacked and deliberately flown into a building.

Originally posted by GoodOlDaveNow that's interesting. I've never heard of an aircraft accident investigator who couldn't figure out the precise cause of a plane crash after it had been hijacked and deliberately flown into a building.

But the fact remains we still have not seen any FBI/NTSB reports matching parts found to any of the 9/11 planes.

---

---

---

---

Originally posted by PHIXER2

Originally posted by GoodOlDaveNow that's interesting. I've never heard of an aircraft accident investigator who couldn't figure out the precise cause of a plane crash after it had been hijacked and deliberately flown into a building.

But the fact remains we still have not seen any FBI/NTSB reports matching parts found to any of the 9/11 planes.

Except for those pesky data and voice recorders. Unless they were "planted" right? And if so, why would any other matches not immeadiately be dismissed as 'planted". Face it, once you have the recorders, there is no doubt what plane crashed.

Originally posted by PHIXER2
But the fact remains we still have not seen any FBI/NTSB reports matching parts found to any of the 9/11 planes.

Why should that make any difference? This fellow is supposedly an aircraft crash investigator for the air force, and in his own words, he doesn't know why an aircraft that had been hijacked and deliberately flown into a building actually crashed. That's the same thing as a police officer who can't figure out why a guy who's been drinking all day wrapped his car around a telephone pole.

Obviously, something isn't being presented to us here honestly, either in this guy's actual credentials or with the actual quote that he really said. These damned fool 9/11 conspiracy web sites are patently notorious for pulling stunts exactly like this. Case in point- what's the name of that guy pretending to be a structural engineer who's REALLY a professor of religion, again?

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Why should that make any difference?

Because without the reports matching the parts to a specific plane then we do not know what planes were there and what really happened that day.

Anyone stating they know what happened without the offcial FBI/NTSB reports are being very dishonest.

Originally posted by PHIXER2

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Why should that make any difference?

Because without the reports matching the parts to a specific plane then we do not know what planes were there and what really happened that day.

Anyone stating they know what happened without the offcial FBI/NTSB reports are being very dishonest.

...so you're saying that without the reports matching the parts to a specific plane, this air force investigator won't be able to figure out why a hijacked plane that had been deliberately flown into a building actually crashed...? Now THAT is like saying a cop won't be able to know why a drunk guy crashed his car into a telephone pole unless he first knows whether the car was red or blue.

This air force investigator is sounding shadier and shadier all the time.