It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Too Many 9/11 Commission Questions Still Unanswered

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:47 PM
link   


When Pandora's Box is finally fully opened on the deceptions and abuses of power by the Cheney/Bush administration ~ the 9/11 conspiracy and cover-up will stand alone as the most treasonous act in American history. Here are 40 experts, including Commission members, who share their misgivings about the 9/11 Commission and the questions left unanswered:

READ MORE HERE - LINK - EDUCATE YOURSELF



[edit on 11-10-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]

Mod Edit: No Quote/Plagiarism – Please Review This Link.

Mod Edit: External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.

Mod Note (This Appears On Every New Thread Page):
AboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count. Please do not create minimal posts to start your new thread. If you feel inclined to make the board aware of news, current events, or important information from other sites; please post one or two paragraphs, a link to the entire story, AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item as a means to inspire discussion or collaborative research on your subject.





[edit on 11/10/2009 by Mirthful Me]




posted on Oct, 13 2009 @ 10:54 PM
link   

Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force, aircraft accident investigator ~ "I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident...
www.thepeoplesvoice.org...
These truthers and their professional titles. Who do they think they are? Anyone can become a Col. or obtain a PHD.

The official story is BUNK, debunked and shot full of holes. What is left of the 911 commission? What part of the 911 commission is fact? any of it?


[edit on 13-10-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]



posted on Oct, 14 2009 @ 11:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by CaptainAmerica2012

Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force, aircraft accident investigator ~ "I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident...


Now that's interesting. I've never heard of an aircraft accident investigator who couldn't figure out the precise cause of a plane crash after it had been hijacked and deliberately flown into a building.



posted on Oct, 14 2009 @ 02:08 PM
link   
reply to post by GoodOlDave
 


Nor have I ever seen an accident investigator who will speak so surely about an incident where he neither set foot at, nor was in the line of command to receive the reports. Until now......



posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 01:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by GoodOlDaveNow that's interesting. I've never heard of an aircraft accident investigator who couldn't figure out the precise cause of a plane crash after it had been hijacked and deliberately flown into a building.


But the fact remains we still have not seen any FBI/NTSB reports matching parts found to any of the 9/11 planes.



posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 01:24 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 01:35 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 02:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by PHIXER2

Originally posted by GoodOlDaveNow that's interesting. I've never heard of an aircraft accident investigator who couldn't figure out the precise cause of a plane crash after it had been hijacked and deliberately flown into a building.


But the fact remains we still have not seen any FBI/NTSB reports matching parts found to any of the 9/11 planes.



Except for those pesky data and voice recorders. Unless they were "planted" right? And if so, why would any other matches not immeadiately be dismissed as 'planted". Face it, once you have the recorders, there is no doubt what plane crashed.



posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 02:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by PHIXER2
But the fact remains we still have not seen any FBI/NTSB reports matching parts found to any of the 9/11 planes.



Why should that make any difference? This fellow is supposedly an aircraft crash investigator for the air force, and in his own words, he doesn't know why an aircraft that had been hijacked and deliberately flown into a building actually crashed. That's the same thing as a police officer who can't figure out why a guy who's been drinking all day wrapped his car around a telephone pole.

Obviously, something isn't being presented to us here honestly, either in this guy's actual credentials or with the actual quote that he really said. These damned fool 9/11 conspiracy web sites are patently notorious for pulling stunts exactly like this. Case in point- what's the name of that guy pretending to be a structural engineer who's REALLY a professor of religion, again?



posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 08:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Why should that make any difference?


Because without the reports matching the parts to a specific plane then we do not know what planes were there and what really happened that day.

Anyone stating they know what happened without the offcial FBI/NTSB reports are being very dishonest.



posted on Oct, 20 2009 @ 12:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by PHIXER2

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Why should that make any difference?


Because without the reports matching the parts to a specific plane then we do not know what planes were there and what really happened that day.

Anyone stating they know what happened without the offcial FBI/NTSB reports are being very dishonest.


...so you're saying that without the reports matching the parts to a specific plane, this air force investigator won't be able to figure out why a hijacked plane that had been deliberately flown into a building actually crashed...? Now THAT is like saying a cop won't be able to know why a drunk guy crashed his car into a telephone pole unless he first knows whether the car was red or blue.

This air force investigator is sounding shadier and shadier all the time.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join