I think it's pretty clear that most right wingers just plain don't like Michael Moore. Hence the cries of "not factual" about BFC and other of his
works. The truth is that practically everything he releases is based on official figures, but because people don't want to think about the content of
his work, they revert to character assassination.
I took a really in depth look at BFC myself and catalogued all the "factual inaccuracies". Turns out that one or two have some basis, and MM hasn't
adequately answered some of them (particularly the tight edit of "48 hours after blahblah") that gives the viewer the idea that Heston visited Flint
within 48 hours of a murder committed by a young child at school. This isn't the case, he went there 8 months later, although some of the residents
were still pretty pissed off about it.
Actually, 48 hours after the murder Heston did try to say that the shooting by the young child didn't warrant extra gun controls, so this may not
have been deliberately deceptive. Anyway, full dicussion is available here...
www.orangeminds.com...
So overall I think MM is probably just a sensational leftist orientated commentator. The right are worried about that, because usually the leftist
guys aren't particularly interested in power or the media (Chomsky for example). Also, some hardcore leftists aren't so happy about having a
commentator who is so bold and media-friendly. Well, that's their opinion and that's ok. I do think his work is entertaining though, and as the
poster above points out, he encourages debate about topics that are generally buried in the mostly right-wing mainstream media.