posted on Feb, 18 2003 @ 05:36 PM
that muslims make up one fourth of the worlds population, so smacking Iraq around is only the tip of the iceberg. Do we attack Iran next, or do we
throw darts at a map of the middle east and go with the random attack mode?
I'm not trying to be funny or a smartass, and even though many in the muslim world also think that saddam is a friggin' nutjob, the people of islam
will stay united. So the real question here is "do the people of the US really want to piss off all of Islam and increase the acts of terrorism
within our borders?".
I don't, since anything sodamn insane does just makes him that much more of a thorn in the sides of the islamic leaders, they'll eventually do him
in or help to sponsor a coup to overthrow the wack job.
Basically, the US does not go out and start fights with 3rd world countries, although we have no qualms finishing them when some freak feels the need
to mess with the US or our allies. The second thing I might add here is that we aren't suppose to involve ourselves with the inner politics of
another nation, outlaw or otherwise.
So really Bob, the question shouldn't be are we rushing into war but rather should we even be starting something that will only bring more grief upon
our people for many years to come, as well as creating another deficit that will take more the 8 years to dig ourselves out of this time.
it sells but whose buying?