It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As the public remains asleep, central bankers around the world continue to destroy the purchasing power of money by steadily increasing its quantity. Inflation is not a mystical residue of an economic or business cycle. It is simply manufactured by central bankers at their own "sweet" will. You do not believe me? Then, consider the following fact-
During the entire 19th century, there was zero inflation! Zip! Nada! In fact, we witnessed mild deflation (contraction of money supply) during that entire century. To put it simply, cash saved in 1800 bought roughly the same amount of goods one hundred years later! In today's world, this is unimaginable, almost absurd! But wasn't money supposed to be a store of value? Obviously not, if Mr. Helicopter Bernanke drops dollar bills from the sky!
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
not sure i get where yer coming from, but i'll give it a shot anyways.
i dont know that ron paul has it all figured out, but in the book he shows examples of how clueless many people in washington are about economics. he certainly is not.
i think the idea is to get back to sound money, i dont think having the treasury print our cash is going to solve anything. that 100 years of no inflation was during a time when our money was backed by something real, i thought you wanted to get back to that?
did i read you right?
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
yeah i think you should checkout end the fed by ron paul. he spearheads everything we're talking about. I'm no economist either but just that a private org. is printing the cash is not the problem. If the treasury did it, then what would change?
The bankruptcy scheme was/is an extremely clever and diabolical plan. How did they possibly pull this scheme off in the area of real estate, the same way they did it in the area of Federal Income Taxes. These Foreign banksters simply and deceptively devised ways and means to con you into declaring yourself a "CITIZEN" or a "RESIDENT" of the corporate U.S. Remember the corporate United States is Bankrupt per agreement and public policy. After you have been tricked into claiming you are one of their corporate United States Citizens, you are given a Social Security Number which ties you to certain meager "benefits" and "privileges." Then, the banksters con your employer to function as an unpaid tax collector to con you into filling out their W-4 intangible property gift forms and 1040 voluntary agreements. These slick paper agreement establishes your "voluntary" indebtedness to the bankster creditor.
The Cover-up
There was a deal struck that, if any person who doesn't have a lawyer to bring a case before the courts, and this person proves the fraud, and speaks the truth about the fraud, the courts are compelled to not allow the case to be cited or published anywhere. The courts cannot afford to have the case freely available in the public archives. This would be evidence of the fraud. This is why you can't hire an attorney. An Attorney is compelled to uphold the fraud.
"Trust Me."
"I'm here to help you."
"I have the governments permission to practice law."
"I'm a Member of the Bar."
The attorney is there for one reason. That reason is to make sure the bankruptcy scam (established by the corporate public policy of the corporate Federal Government) is upheld. The lawyer's will cite no cases for you that will go against the bankruptcy in cooperate public policy. Whatever the lawyers do for you is a bunch of BULL ROAR. The lawyers have to support the bankruptcy and public policy by supporting it, even at your expense. The lawyers can't go against the corporate Federal Government statutes implementing, protecting and administrating the bankruptcy.
For all cases cited, those in the U.S. Code or the state annotated code or any other source, you may be sure that they only selected those cases that support the public policy of bankruptcy. The legal system has to work that way. After the last 30-4-50 years of cases after cases having been decided based upon upholding the bankruptcy, how could the legal system possibly allow someone to come into court and put in the record substantial information and argument to prove the fraud?