It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This is a common problem in securities laws, which Congress leaves intentionally vague, encouraging regulators and prosecutors to try people even when the law is unclear.
Under the English common law we inherited, a crime requires intent. This protection is disappearing in the U.S. As Mr. Silverglate writes, "Since the New Deal era, Congress has delegated to various administrative agencies the task of writing the regulations," even as "Congress has demonstrated a growing dysfunction in crafting legislation that can in fact be understood." Prosecutors identify defendants to go after instead of finding a law that was broken and figuring out who did it. Expect more such prosecutions as Washington adds regulations.
Originally posted by fraterormus
This is yet another reason why the mandate of Congress should be changed to no longer be able to vote upon the Laws which they write! If we allow them to continue to pen the Legislation, then it must be open for public scrutiny and approval, and therefore clear and concise enough to be understood by the layman. Anything less would only continue to this divide between Citizen/Criminal and Lawyer/Government.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Too much hysteria in the OP. My wife is a lawyer and on many occasions she stated the importance of proven intent in prosecuting/defending the case. The link in the OP represents a few hiccups in the system for sure but these are far from a trend.
The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.
--Ayn Rand
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Too much hysteria in the OP. My wife is a lawyer and on many occasions she stated the importance of proven intent in prosecuting/defending the case. The link in the OP represents a few hiccups in the system for sure but these are far from a trend.
How about OJ? Found Not Guilty, still had to give up millions and all future earnings, and then get the maximum penalty for an admitted set-up! (He may be an azz and deserve it, but that doesn't make it ok to manipulate the law!)
“There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one “makes” them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted — and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on the guilt.” – Ayn Rand, _Atlas Shrugged
Originally posted by memarf1
reply to post by really
So instead of imprisoning their body we bankrupt them and ruin their lives. That makes sense, I mean why would we want to be 100% sure they were guilty to just take their livelihoods. Yeah sure, I'm "Pretty Sure" he did it, lets just take everything he has and I suppose we are justified because he is "Probably" guilty.
Outrageous, Egregious, Salacious! Completely Absurd!
[edit on 29-9-2009 by memarf1]
TextArkansas · Think twice while in Arkansas if you harbor an unflagging passion for cold cut sandwiches and honking your car horn. Arkansas authorities have deemed it illegal to blare a car horn where ice cold beverages or sandwiches are served after 9 p.m. ·
In Topeka, Kansas, it is unlawful to transport dead poultry along Kansas Avenue. Lesson: look elsewhere for a KFC. ·
Make sure your canine does not harbor a weird fetish for tailgate lights or trailer hitches while in Fort Thomas, Kentucky. You’ll be fined if your pet molests a vehicle. ·
If you are a horn-honking hooligan you better be carrying your vehicle’s bill of sale if you have the nerve to toot your horn while in University City, Missouri. Officials there have wisely made it illegal to honk the horn of someone else’s car. ·
In Oregon you need to be not only alert for state troopers with speed guns, but also with stop watches. For you can be ticketed if you leave your car door open longer than is deemed necessary. ·
In Scituate, Rhode Island, it is illegal to drive with beer in your vehicle even if it is unopened. So, in other words, if you’re a beer delivery driver you’re screwed.
Arkansas: The Little Rock parliament passed a law forbidding the Arkansas River to rise higher than the level of the Main Street Bridge.
In Mobile, pigeons are prohibited from eating the pebbles on composite roofs.
Anyone caught causing "unseemly laughter" by wearing a false moustache in church will be arrested.
It is forbidden for a man may beat his wife more than once a month
It is illegal to mispronounce the name of the state of Arkansas.
Alaska In Fairbanks, moose are forbidden from having sex on the city streets.
By law no child is allowed to build a snowman taller than himself within school grounds.
Connecticutt Nobody in Devon is allowed to walk backwards after sunset.
In Delaware it is illegal for a person to pawn his wooden leg.
In Hartford, it is illegal to kiss your wife on Sunday.
Illinois It is against the law to make faces at dogs.
Wearing pyjamas while fishing is prohibited in Chicago.
It is illegal to carry fish tackle into a cemetery in Muncie.
Massachusetts Tomatoes must not be put in clam chowder.
At a wake, mourners may eat no more than three sandwiches.
Snoring is prohibited unless all bedroom windows are closed and securely locked.
I would like to know the 3 felonies I commit every day though.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Too much hysteria in the OP. My wife is a lawyer and on many occasions she stated the importance of proven intent in prosecuting/defending the case. The link in the OP represents a few hiccups in the system for sure but these are far from a trend.
Tell that to Martha Stewart! Or any of the other people that have successfully beaten their cases only to have technicalities uncovered during the case drawn up and prosecuted with severe penalties!
How about OJ? Found Not Guilty, still had to give up millions and all future earnings, and then get the maximum penalty for an admitted set-up! (He may be an azz and deserve it, but that doesn't make it ok to manipulate the law!)
How about the guy in the ATS thread, found Not Guilty of transporting controlled substances, and then have a trumped up charge of abandoning his lab (while he was in jail, and the lab was secured) get him a 2 year sentence!
How about the Florida man that was distributing perfectly legal porn, but is about to serve several years because a myriad of laws were combined and overlapped so that he violated decency standards, and then his other actions became crimes?
How about Rico statutes? Can't get them on one crime, get circumstantial evidence on a bunch of minor violations, package them up and invoke Rico!
How about thing like paraphenalia? Pipe not a crime. But combine it with another misdemeanor possession and it becomes a secondary crime!
How about a legally registered gun, in a legal car, with legal cash won at a casino. Now, when pulled over the overzealous cop violates your rights, trumps up suspicion, searches car, finds cash, continues illegal search, finds weapon, checks cash and like all other US cash it contains trace coc aine, then the gun becomes a felony (even though it was legal a second ago), then the cash and car become property of the state, and you are facing at least two felonies! Now it gets worse because you told the cop that you didn't have any drugs, so you have lied to a police officer, impeded an investigation, and resisted arrest! How about a life sentence for exercising your 2nd amendment and getting a little lucky on the slot machines!
How about Rico statutes? Can't get them on one crime, get circumstantial evidence on a bunch of minor violations, package them up and invoke Rico!
Example?
In a Georgia case, a defendant tried to argue that since the federal RICO act does not explicitly forbid participation in a legitimate corporation, it was insulated from liability under the Georgia RICO Act which saw federal case law as instructive in its interpretation. 109 The court in that case properly ruled that "the fact that [the defendant] was a legitimate corporation does not insulate it from RICO liability." 110 Federal case law contradicted the defendant's treatment of the issue. 111 Also, the Georgia statute specifically included "illicit as well as licit enterprises" as targets of RICO prosecution