It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Oklahoma City Bombing Tapes Appear Edited: Attorney (VIDEO)

page: 1
22
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 05:18 PM
link   

Oklahoma City Bombing Tapes Appear Edited: Attorney (VIDEO)


www.huffingtonpost.com

Long-secret security tapes showing the chaos immediately after the 1995 bombing of the Oklahoma City federal building are blank in the minutes before the blast and appear to have been edited, an attorney who obtained the recordings said Sunday.

"The real story is what's missing," said Jesse Trentadue, a Salt Lake City attorney who obtained the recordings through the federal Freedom of Information Act as part of an unofficial inquiry he is conducting into the April 19, 1995, bombing that killed 168 people and injured hundreds more.

Trentadue gave copies of the tapes to The Oklahoman newspaper, which posted them online and provided copies to The Associated Press.

Read more at: www.huffingtonpost.com...
(visit the link for the full news article)



[edit on 27-9-2009 by grover]




posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 05:18 PM
link   
As we know Timothy McVeigh admitted to bombing the Murrah federal Building on Oklahoma and was executed for it at his request.

We also know that it was widely reported that he had an partner other than Nichols who was with him when he rented the truck he built the bomb in.

It was never proven if he actually had a partner though...and if memory serves he denied that he did...though I could be wrong about that.

So the question is...was this video edited as this investigating attorney claims and if so what is edited out...

Is it possible that McVeigh's mysterious partner was actually an employee at the Murrah Federal building...possibly someone with enough clout to have this video edited?

And if so...why?

www.huffingtonpost.com
(visit the link for the full news article)


+3 more 
posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 06:01 PM
link   
Probably because you would have seen that there were explosions from inside the building, because there were explosives placed inside the building.










There are four legally admissible documents testifying to the fact that 2nd and 3rd unexploded bombs were removed from the building after the bombing. In the civilian affidavit it's even noted that one of the bombs was removed from a gas pipeline to which it was attached.

This was a public federal building with a daycare inside. A definite no-no for anyone to be "storing" live bombs, especially of such size as described. No investigation or any follow-ups to this, though, of course.

Just another false-flag to be lied about in our history books..



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 06:03 PM
link   
reply to post by grover
 



"Four cameras in four different locations going blank at basically the same time on the morning of April 19, 1995. There ain't no such thing as a coincidence," Trentadue said. Read more at: www.huffingtonpost.com...



That is definitely suspicious .

Government official :

"they had run out of tape" or "the tape was being replaced." Read more at: www.huffingtonpost.com...


Is it possible that the camera `s were all on one system ? Just playing devil`s advocate here .

With the history that Jesse Trentadue, the Salt Lake City attorney has with this case , and the money from the lawsuit ,it would seem he is not going to let this go away. I`m sure the Trentadue family have put a substantial portion of the $1.1million award , towards investigating further.

It would remind one of those tapes of the pentagon attack . More withheld footage.


Read more at: www.huffingtonpost.com...




Just thought i`d embed the video Grover .
Thanks for posting this .



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 06:05 PM
link   
Very interesting revelation, I remember the day the Murrah Federal Building was bombed. I was at my grandfather's house watching the news, and after watching the devastation, I asked my grandfather who would do such a thing? He just watched in silence and shook his .. Who knows what his thought process was concerning the event. However, it probably wasn't the first time seeing devastation on that scale since being a veteran of World War II in the Pacific. He passed away from cancer within the year.

The attack caused a very deep wound and still many unanswered questions remain. I have heard that McVeigh had a third accomplice who remains unidentified at present, and now alleged doctoring of the security tapes before the blast? Then I heard somewhere, that it may have been Islamic terrorists and McVeigh was used as a patsy to take the heat off President Clinton after the first trade center bombings and the disaster in Waco. With this recent revelation the conspiracy only widens.

[edit on 27-9-2009 by Jakes51]



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 06:10 PM
link   
"They" said the OKC bombing was a response to what happened at Waco, which had rubbed a lot of gun-toting constitutionalists the wrong way. When this bombing happened, the feds were immediately on the offensive against said patriots, and this is when the trend of the FBI looking at constitutionalists as "domestic terrorists" really started to take off.

Put short, this was a false flag that allowed the government to take extra measures against civilian militias, gun enthusiasts and constitutionalists, again, that had been riled up by Waco. Anyone unfamiliar with Texas, yeah, it's a big "red" state. Oklahoma is Texas' back yard.

There were at least two undetonated bombs removed from the building. The whole thing would have been leveled if they went off, not just a huge chunk taken out of the middle. No one wants to talk about those bombs or how they got there.



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 06:13 PM
link   
I am all but certain it was homegrown terrorists...McVeigh most certainly since he admitted it but who else besides him and Nichols is the big question. And, if these tapes were edited it seriously suggests at the very least an inside accomplice.



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 06:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by grover
And, if these tapes were edited it seriously suggests at the very least an inside accomplice.


There was also an independent study that concluded there were multiple blasts, not just a single truck bomb detonation as reported, that was heavily criticized by the Pentagon which launched its own "investigation."

There definitely is a lot more to the story than was reported. I can't tell you what hand McVeigh or anyone else had in it, except that I never heard anything about them planting the 2nd and 3rd bombs in the building, yet you have full glorious documentation of those bombs from FEMA, the DoD and a civilian above.



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 06:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by grover
I am all but certain it was homegrown terrorists...McVeigh most certainly since he admitted it but who else besides him and Nichols is the big question. And, if these tapes were edited it seriously suggests at the very least an inside accomplice.


Apparently, the official story is that it was homegrown terrorists, McVeigh and Nichols. However, McVeigh fit the mold of homegrown terrorists as has already been mentioned on the thread. Disgruntled Gulf War Vet, fan of " The Turner Diaries," radical right wing literature, distaste at the Federal response in Waco, and other characteristics best suited for a potential patsy.

Now if the tape have been doctored as alleged, wouldn't it be easy to scare the daylights of both Nichols and McVeigh to sign off on a coaxed confession? There are some nefarious characters who conducted this investigation as well as Waco. Many unanswered questions and a shoddy investigation fraught with loose ends. I wouldn't be surprised if this recent finding is only the tip of the iceberg concerning this diabolical affair.

[edit on 27-9-2009 by Jakes51]



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 06:30 PM
link   
reply to post by grover
 


I suspect that the Oklahoma City Bombing was a premeditated act of provoking a suspect, Timothy McVeigh, to commit an atrocious action, setting him up as the patsy like Oswald with J.F.K.

This would give the F.B.I. a precedent before hand to make Project Megiddo happen.

Look at all the agencies who were in the Murrah Building as a group of suspects.

Who had the most to gain from all of this in order to gain more funding?

If they sent in agent provocateurs in order to stir up the militia McVeigh was in, they could have easily spotted him as a willing patsy, willing to die for a cause.

Is it not odd that Project Megiddo is almost identical to the M.I.A.C. Report?

Continually going after the militia groups, Constitutionally protected groups, who have the right to defend America, and thereby weakening our rights as citizens.

Are You "Right-Wing Fringe", or "Left-Wing Fringe" and How Will They Push You

According to the book, The 80 Greatest Conspiracies Of All Time, Iraqi's after the first Iraq War, were involved as well.

[edit on 27-9-2009 by SpartanKingLeonidas]



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 06:59 PM
link   
Been a long time since I researched this but weren't there reports of figures in the shadows at night in the building during the weekend before this happened? I seem to remember this being reported, not by the MSM but in eyewitness accounts leading up to the bombing. I could be wrong, I'll go a searching later if I find the time.

I'd bet McVeigh and Nichols had little or nothing to do with this. Just another false-flag to take our rights away.



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 07:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by grover
I am all but certain it was homegrown terrorists...

You are? Then pease tell me, what "homegrown terrorist" planted the second and third bombs inside the Murrah Federal Building?

What "homegrown terrorist" edited the FBI surveiilance tapes?

What "homegrown terrorist" assassinated JFK, RFK and MLK?

What "homegrown terrorist" downed TWA 800, then refused to admit it was a accidental missile strike from a U.S. Navy warship?

Could it be the same "homegrown terrorist" that "pulled" WTC 1, 2, and 7 and flew a missile, err, I mean Flight 77 into the Pentagon, then confiscated all the CCTV surveillance tapes from nearby businesses instead of having to edit them?

Could it be the same "terrorists" that cooked up the Gulf of Tonkin deception and invaded Iraq on the phony pretense of "weapons of mass destruction?"

The "terrorists" you're thinking of aren't U.S. citizens, radical Muslims or the equally phony al-Qaeda (al-CIAduh) or the long-dead Osama bin Laden (aka Tim Osman of CIA fame.)

I'm afraid the real terrorist is our very own government, or should I say globalist elements within our government like the neocons and PNAC cabal, who planned and executed 9/11.



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 07:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by bsbray11
Put short, this was a false flag that allowed the government to take extra measures against civilian militias, gun enthusiasts and constitutionalists, again, that had been riled up by Waco.

There were at least two undetonated bombs removed from the building. The whole thing would have been leveled if they went off, not just a huge chunk taken out of the middle. No one wants to talk about those bombs or how they got there.

You got it -- just another false flag by our lovely government.


Originally posted by TheLoony
I'd bet McVeigh and Nichols had little or nothing to do with this. Just another false-flag to take our rights away.

Ding, ding, ding -- we have another winner.

P.S. This story (an AP article, no less) should receive dozens of flags and be on the front page of ATS.

Maybe 20 or 30 years from now, the treasonous MSM will start reporting the hundreds of 9/11 "official story" anomalies.





[edit on 27-9-2009 by GoldenFleece]



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 07:26 PM
link   
I don't like the talk kof Oklahoma City reappearing like it has been lately.
Remember guys, the FED is in the course of possibly being audited and they ain't liking it at all.

JFK had dealings with the FED.
They are the most powerful organization in the United States EASILY and possibly the most powerful in the entire world.
They will do whatever it takes to stonewall efforts to root out their corruption. And they can do a lot.

The language out there right now is painting the picture to the hypnotized American's that homegrown terrorism is real. Boy, I don't want to see what they have on the drawing boards right about now. You know they have something.



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 10:20 PM
link   
After a quick search, I came across this.




One of those witnesses is bombing survivor Jane Graham, who was interviewed last year and again earlier this year by The New American. Mrs. Graham cannot be written off as your stereotypical "anti-government, right-wing wacko." A lifelong Democrat, Graham is a public housing specialist with the federal HUD office in Oklahoma City and president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 3138. Mrs. Graham is especially troubled and angry because of the government’s failure to follow through on testimony by her and others concerning suspects inside the building prior to the bombing. According to Graham, the week before the bombing she came upon three men on the second level of the parking garage, behind an old station wagon, with what appeared to be plans of the Murrah Building. "At first I thought, as I studied them, they were with the phone company, because I saw what looked like telephone wiring," she says.

However, after mentally reconstructing the incident and talking to three other survivors (we have since discovered a fourth) who also saw the strange men in the parking garage, and who experienced the same odd treatment from the FBI, she became disturbed.

According to Graham, "When I first told my story [to the FBI], the only question asked was, ‘Was one of the men McVeigh?’ I told the agent absolutely not." She was puzzled that she was not asked to describe the men, look at photos, work with a sketch artist, or provide any other information about the incident. "I wanted to know why no one asked questions about the week before the bombing and if anyone saw anything suspicious," she says. "Apparently the FBI was not interested in any time other than the Monday or Tuesday the week of the bombing. And only if the responses pointed directly to McVeigh. My question is: Why is it that they were only interested if information was related to McVeigh? It appears that the FBI had an agenda which was to only target McVeigh and Nichols."


www.geocities.com...

Not exactly what I remember and I am unsure of the source but it's close. Maybe I am confusing this incident with another. It's possible.



posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 11:22 PM
link   
reply to post by bsbray11
 


...thx for posting that, especially the affidavit from tiffany bible...


...the fertilizer bomb in the ryder truck went off at 9:05... tiffany bible, a paramedic (allegedly), claims she arrived at 9:07... in her affidavit, she claimed to have a discussion with an ATF agent who said the "car bomb" was because of waco... her conversation with that agent ended by 9:15, WAY too early for anyone to know the reasons why someone bombed the murrah federal building... she got to the murrah federal building within 2 minutes of the explosion - and - she spends her first eight minutes there chit-chatting with an ATF agent when there are injured and dying people are all over the place - blows her integrity right to hell, imo... what i think is that she's a bs plant...



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 05:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by GoldenFleece

Originally posted by grover
I am all but certain it was homegrown terrorists...

You are? Then pease tell me, what "homegrown terrorist" planted the second and third bombs inside the Murrah Federal Building?

What "homegrown terrorist" edited the FBI surveiilance tapes?


Since McVeigh admitted it on death row after he had stopped all appeals so he had nothing to gain or lose from it I will take him at his word until it is proven otherwise...

but your logic is flawed....if there were second and third bombs inside the Murrah building and if the tapes were edited and if they were done by the government...then by necessity the actions were homegrown.

[edit on 28-9-2009 by grover]



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 08:11 AM
link   
Unequivocal evidence of multiple explosions within the building entirely excised from the official story. The 9/11 parallels are haunting.



As a refresher, Indictment: Inside the Oklahoma City Bombing Grand Jury - The Hoppy Heidelberg Story documents how one conscientious and courageous juror was dismissed from the Federal Grand Jury that indicted Tim McVeigh and Nichols, because he refused to acquiesce to the ongoing cover-up of evidence.


Google Video Link


(Poor quality VHS transfer)


[edit on 28-9-2009 by EvilAxis]



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 09:10 AM
link   
news.yahoo.com...

Well it's on the front page of Yahoo... Wonder why this is coming out now....



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 09:20 AM
link   
False Flag gone wrong.

Bungled by the handlers. Hastily covered up.

Apparently it's easy to cover things up in America. So many people who won't agree on anything or take action about anything and continue to remain in their state of malaise and apathy with few exceptions.

laughable if it wasn't so sad.

[edit on 28-9-2009 by djusdjus]



new topics

top topics



 
22
<<   2 >>

log in

join