It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
The alternative debunking explanations for this phenomenon, are only two, and neither seems to work I don't think, not in my opinion based on ALL the evidence, even including the evidence for controlled demolition of the towers, they are:
A bird
- which would have to be a HUGE bird, some have suggested a white abatross
ALBATROSS
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4a1930faa6cc.jpg[/atsimg]
Originally posted by SPreston
The Satam al-Suqami paper passport was allegedly found by a stranger and handed to a NYPD detective who of course neglected to get the stranger's name and address.
But of course there is no chance it was a 9-11 perp handing over the unblemished paper passport is there?
But the duhbunkers and government loyalists and shills all believe this is a perfectly normal way to gather criminal evidence from complete strangers, and would never suspect an unsinged unburned not even smudged paper passport which just survived an explosive fireball supposedly inside the pocket of an alleged hijacker inside the fuselage of a burning aircraft.
Isn't FAITH just grand? Aren't 9-11 MIRACLES just wonderful?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/429f56b0257d.jpg[/atsimg]
Larger version
Passport exterior cover
It is reported that the passport of hijacker Satam Al Suqami has been found a few blocks from the World Trade Center. [ABC News, 9/12/2001; Associated Press, 9/16/2001; ABC News, 9/16/2001] Barry Mawn, the director of the FBI’s New York office, says police and FBI found it during a “grid search” of the area. [CNN, 9/18/2001] However a senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission later claims it was actually discovered by a passerby and given to an NYPD detective, “shortly before the World Trade Center towers collapsed.”
source
Originally posted by micpsi
No? Well, if you are willing to accept that they were merely sheets of paper and light debris scattered into the air, why on earth are you not willing to accept that the first dot of light was not also a piece of A4 that had come out of the impact hole or shattered windows of the North Tower?
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
reply to post by micpsi
It passes across the building in the far foreground, that's why, and binks on, and off.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
I just want to make sure you guys fully understand this, then conclude whatever you like.
It passes in front of (or on) the brown building in the foreground, and therefore, must not be confused with the ejecting debris material from the explosion way over at the south tower. If paper, it would have to be first HUGE, even at any appreciable distance between the camera and the foreground building, and second, travelling no where near the south tower, and it actually binks on and OFF thorugh the frames, appears to move in and out, or "flutter", on the fireball (even though it can't be anywhere NEAR the south tower) and is otherwise unmoved by wind or turbulence, since it moves steadily and horizontally, relative to the south tower, and then half way across the foreground building, before disappearing.
One would be fored to conclude, that it's near horiztal movement across the face of the south tower, it's jumping around on the fireball, and finally it's movement on the foreground building, as well as the appearance, briefly of an identical phenomenon on the building with the green copper spire (Woolworth Building I think it's called) - that these things are merely coincidence.
To the person who is unaware of the proximity of the brown building in the foreground, it would appear to have been moved by impact turbulence and explosion over near the south tower, and even confused (as the past poster interpreted it) with some of the debris ejected there during the impact, but that is not the case and can't be, give the relative location of the building in the far foreground. It would then have to be three pieces of paper, one on the south tower, another debris from the fireball, and a third, several blocks away, at the far foreground building - but it's not and is the same phenomenon throughout.
A GIANT piece of debris floating in the air, on that path, is the ONLY other explanation for it - but it's behavior is consistent with the path of a targeting laser light spot, and it fits the profile, it moves around on the fireball, to suddenly appear across the face of the brown building at Liberty street in the far foreground, a kilometer or more from the south tower and the explosion. It also blinks on, and off, through the frames.
Please consider that, before making a final assumption - the movement across the south tower, blinking on and off, the jump to and movement around the fireball, and then finally, it's downward movement across the far foreground building, blinking on and off, to disappear, half way across the building in the foreground.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Is that because I WANT it to be a laser light spot?
Or based on the actual phenomenon itself, am >I< insane because they, the debunkers MUST show, prove, or exclaim, that it is a piece of paper, and cannot accept anything otherwise, in spite of evidence to the contrary? Since we're down to an either/or proposition here, because it's not a bird. Thus, even if there were additional evidence in support of the notion that this is a targeting laser and the plane a remotely piloted military type B-767, that would be rejected out of hand, because no other explanation, than that offered by the MSM and the 9/11 Commission, is allowed - such evil cannot lurk within our own gate, say the sceptics. That is no foundation for an argument, or, rational analysis however. That's just hyperbole and conjecture, based on a strongly rooted conviction, nothing more.
I've offered my anaysis of why I think what I do, which includes what I've discovered about the destruction of the twin towers and building 7.
What is their reasoning, their logic,
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
A GIANT piece of debris floating in the air, on that path (between camera and foreground building), is the ONLY other explanation for it
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
reply to post by waypastvne
Fair enough, thank you for posting that.
I was wrong.
That clears that up. Thank you.
I'll admit when I'm wrong about something.