Originally posted by RoofMonkey
As with regards to Rathke, I look at it from a chain of command point of view. No matter what happens, ultimate responsibility resides with the
HMFIC. That's why a CO of a ship gets investigated or removed from command should his bridge crew screw up and run it aground. Ultimately, he's
responsible.
No excuses.
No crying.
No whining.
To do less is morally corrupt.
Exactly, It parallels something as basic as a family unit. The Leader is the one that sets the tone.
For those yet to be fathers'/husbands' as you lead so your family follows. It's not always the case, there are some bad family heads, and great
honest kids emerge from those families. Those are the exceptions. The converse is true as well... sometimes there's nothing that you can do for the
followers.
Fortunately, those are the exceptions.
It's my opinion that leadership has everything to do with ACORN's (and governments) problems.
The court system turns a blind eye to the 'leadership' influence as it probably should... The fact that
Dale Rathke mislead many in the organization and was later
discovered sets a bad example.
Like giving your kids a pass. When my former step son was caught spray painting graffiti on a garage door ... the cops recognized him when they showed
up when we reported a bike stolen...
We didn't cover it up. I told the cops that I would handle it and next day we went to the garage door and he removed all of the graffiti even some
that others had done. No passes.
It has everything to do with appropriate leadership. Whether it's family or corporate. (Or non-profit.) =)
ALSO: where were Rathke's before they started loosing funding??? That is the most important question.
He shows up for interviews only after they are removing funding. Shouldn't he have lawyers filing claims of no wrong doing?
Smells like damage control extreme. Follow the money. Lead with ethics and conscience. (Not fear and guilt.)