House admonishes Wilson for his 'You lie' outburst, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 15-9-2009 @ 06:50 PM by Aggie Man
Originally posted by Wimbly
reply to post by schrodingers dog


Can you explain why the MSM was not outraged when Democrats boo'd Bush in the State of the Union speech? Can you explain the lack of outrage when Harry Reid called Bush a "loser" in the senate? Of course not, because the MSM manipulates the outrage in all of you.


Because Harry Reid did not interrupt Bush during an address to congress.


reply posted on 15-9-2009 @ 07:20 PM by Wimbly
reply to post by Aggie Man


Because Harry Reid did not interrupt Bush during an address to congress.


Come on man, you've seen the video. They boo'd Bush in the middle of the State of the Union! This wasn't even a big speech. Its one of Obama's many, many speeches. What about Pete Stark? For some reason the MSM wasn't outraged and no apologies were needed. Why is that?




[edit on 15-9-2009 by Wimbly]



reply posted on 15-9-2009 @ 07:25 PM by Aggie Man
Originally posted by Wimbly
reply to post by Aggie Man


Because Harry Reid did not interrupt Bush during an address to congress.


Come on man, you've seen the video. They boo'd Bush in the middle of the State of the Union! This wasn't even a big speech. Its one of Obama's many, many speeches. What about Pete Stark? For some reason the MSM wasn't outraged and no apologies were needed. Why is that?




[edit on 15-9-2009 by Wimbly]


I will only comment by saying that booing is not an accusation. Where as calling someone a liar is. I'm not familiar with the Pete Stark incident, but I would guess that he did not break any rules of protocol.


reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 04:05 PM by zappafan1
So, Wilson told the truth and called BHO a liar concerning illegal aliens having access to health care insurance. They already illegally have access to health care, and are driving up the costs to the hospital and driving up the cost for Americans, who have to foot the bill.... in more ways than one. One hospital in California, alone, were $6 Billion in the red because of this very thing, and may have to close it's doors.


I know...... it all depends on which version of the bill you read; there's three of them (four, now with the Baucus Plan), but I read every line of 3200, three times, and there is nothing there that would allow a hospital or insurance company to first check on a persons citizenship, so Wilson was right. Actually, BHO lied about pretty much everything he said concerning health care. If state run (Socialized / Marxist) health care isn't the end game, then there's no reason for government to change anything. They simply want control of one-seventh of our economy.

Americans have elected the enemy to this country, and every day more and more people across the political spectrum are finding that out. The sad part, is that Barny Fwank, the one person above many who caused the economic downturn because of housing loans, now wants to chair the very office HUD, and wants to do MORE of what got us in this mess to begin with.

Wilson wasn't the first to do this..... the Dems have done it multiple times, but not one of them was censored.

[edit on 17-9-2009 by zappafan1]


reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 04:38 PM by burdman30ott6
reply to post by Aggie Man


Here is the problem with this. They didn't admonsih him over where he was when he jumped up and called the POTUS a liar, they admonsihed him over what he said to the POTUS. The democrats are the damn LAST group in this country who should be shaking fingers at what representatives say to the sitting president or what they call him in public. It was because of them that we already had a discourse in the House regarding "No, you may not call the president a liar."
rawstory.com...
"Rep. Mel Watt (D-N.C.) offered a lengthy criticism of Bush’s record toward the end of Thursday’s hearing, which included a statement that Bush lied about the reasons for going to war with Iraq in 2003," writes Susan Davis. "Rep. Chris Cannon (R-Utah) offered an objection on the grounds that Watt’s words were 'unparliamentary' and violated House rules on debate and decorum that forbid personal attacks on Members, the president or vice president."

but curiously, Democrat rep Linda Sanchez rebutted:
"Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee Chairwoman Linda Sánchez (D-Calif.) countered that the words were not 'unparliamentary,' which parliamentarians and leadership aides on both sides of the aisle later agreed was the wrong procedural call,"


...fast forward to this week. The vote tally:
clerk.house.gov...
YEA'S
*SNIP*
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Salazar
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky


Well, well, well...

The times they are a' changing... on BOTH sides of the aisle. As was already said, this "admonsihment" was nothing more than a partisan stunt aimed at giving Nancy Pelosi something to waggle her turkey neck waddle over on TV.


reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 12:56 AM by Alien Mind
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by octotom


Nobody cares.
Waste of time.


you coming in here to say that was a waste of time...so you fail


reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 12:59 AM by Alien Mind
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Originally posted by Wimbly
reply to post by schrodingers dog


Can you explain why the MSM was not outraged when Democrats boo'd Bush in the State of the Union speech? Can you explain the lack of outrage when Harry Reid called Bush a "loser" in the senate? Of course not, because the MSM manipulates the outrage in all of you.


Because Harry Reid did not interrupt Bush during an address to congress.

So does that mean Wilson can call Obama a liar during his State of the Union address?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^