reply to post by keldas
I think this is a combination of things actually.
The use of public libraries has been in decline for many years as far as I am aware.
Spending cuts make it a perfect target for saving money.
And with the increased access to the net, fewer and fewer people will be using them in the future.
It is a shame. But it just goes to show, if you don't use it you lose it.
As a writer, I regularly have to research various subjects, and I don't find the internet anywhere near as useful as physical books. Information is
often unreliable and I have to find direct quotes from print to be sure. Or I have to find corroborative information from more than one source.
Where I could work my way through several books and find all the information I need, and more, leading to interesting new paths, on the Internet I
find it takes twice as long, the results from searches are misleading and generally have the aim of selling something, and when an example from print
is found you often have to pay for it.
It's not acceptable in my opinion to remove such a public service and leave a void. If this is the way of the future, other avenues have to be
supplied to provide the public access to literature.
The internet is not free in most places, and there are no thorough websites where complete libraries can be accessed free of charge.
That is what we need.