It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
LOL. Really, I did.
How can you sue someone for something you did to yourself? No one tied you up and made you sit there and watch anything.
Originally posted by stevegmu
Proving yourself to be mentally ill before a judge is a good way to get committed...
Originally posted by spikey
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
On the other hand, it would be mutually beneficial to all concerned when you think about it.
The MSM has for the most part, not mentioned or generally reported on the myriad controversies and debates that rage surrounding 9/11 and so on (and rightly so, if the truth, one way or another is revealed or confirmed), so taking the issues to the courts, which have to adhere to strict rules of evidence and process, will filmed by the MSM.
Exposure, regardless of whether you think you have the facts, or the other guy does, will be guaranteed to both camps.
The issue would be properly debated and investigated, and the facts and evidences and viewpoints could be raised in a legal setting, in front of the world. (Via the MSM, who would have to cover it)
Of course, the only people who would not wish to see such an event, would be those that were involved in a widely suspected plot.
The 'Truthers' and 'Anti- whatever they call their outfits, would both get confirmation of their particular version of the truth of events, in a legal framework, in front of everyone...or not of course.
Would a civil case, be the key to getting at the real truth? I think maybe it is.
A court case, even a civil one about a topic such as this, would seriously attract the media ( an honest media that is) and public interest.
OK, so if you go ahead and litigate..this debate should finally get interesting, without the bickering and intellectual snobbery.
We may get to the real nitty gritty, whatever that may be.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
The majority of mentally ill people are not in institutions.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
This is not something you will win.
~Keeper
Finally, when Campbell filed her $54 million attention-getting lawsuit later that month, the company upped its offer: $2,500 in cash.
Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
Well, I personally feel you are casting your fishing line into the wrong pond. That said, if you are still gainfully employed, and not on Social Security disability for mental illness, again, good luck. You have to show some sort of history of disablement. Just saying it is so isn't good enough.
I do understand your point, I just think this will harm you more than help you.