It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by tjack
The DAWT concept is not based on "amplifying" the wind. The idea is to increase the efficiency of the turbine by reducing tip vortices from the blades.
Originally posted by Now_Then
reply to post by Ex_MislTech
I'm not sure how much you would gain by artificially focusing it though - maybe just using geography? Or buildings?
Originally posted by tjack
reply to post by Ex_MislTech
No, I understand that your idea is different, I was just saying that the concept of getting more power out of a given speed of wind, "amplifying" it, so to speak, was not new.
See that little part where I mentioned the novelty of your approach?
Originally posted by Ex_MislTech
The power gain is specified by a cube in power for double the wind
speed, ie. if its boosts the wind up to double the speed you get
8 times the prior power.
Originally posted by Ex_MislTech
I turned this in to Google's 100 ideas to help the world, but it went ignored.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
If you take a cross-sectional area of wind and reduce it's size to, say, half of what it was, you have decreased the area by a factor of 4. that means the wind will be moving 4 times as fast as it was when it entered the tunnel.
But it also means the wind energy is concentrated into an area one fourth the size it was. A turbine gets power from the blades, which would be one-fourth as big since the wind is one-fourth the size. So you have 4 times the energy and one-fourth the area to get it. 4/4=1.
Keep thinking, but this one won't work.
(Star for Phage for an excellent description of the problem and of the venturi effect.)
TheRedneck