I'm sure by now we're all aware of the Charlie Sheen & President Obama
story and the
controversy it has caused, which I can to a degree, understand, but regardless of how you feel, this was great opportunity to get a lot of information
about 9/11 to the masses, and for that alone you have to commend Alex Jones and Charlie Sheen for trying, but the way in which it was carried out
obviously had the opposite effect of it's intended result.
There are people who will not, under any circumstance read or research anything related to 9/11 being an inside job, or will for one minute consider
the thought of it being allowed to happen, and they don't because most of what you hear in the mainstream about "conspiracy theorists" or anyone
questioning official version of accounts is tainted with images of tinfoil hat wearing weirdos.
Any opportunity (within reason) to awake people should be grasped with both hands, but this has fallen by the way side before it's even got going,
and it's a real shame. Yes the "interview" was fake, we can't argue with that, but what about the information within the interview, is that fake?
CS – On pages two and three, sir, are the statements, as well, from commission co-chairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, commissioners Bob Kerrey,
Timothy Roemer and John Lehman, as well as the statements of commissioner Max Cleland, an ex-Senator from Georgia , who resigned, stating:
“It is a national scandal. This investigation is now compromised. One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9/11 issue is so
important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up.”
He also described President Bush’s desire to delay the process as not to damage the ‘04 re-election bid. They suspected deception to the point
where they considered referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation. Mr. President, this information alone is
unequivocally grounds for a new investigation!
If your answer is no, then why object to the method used of trying to get people to view it, especially when the same tactics have been used to keep
us ignorant? Time to fight fire with fire no, this is an "Infowar" after all is it not? I thoroughly enjoyed reading it, and upon reading the
disclaimer was a little annoyed that it hadn't actually happened, but I also thought what a great idea it was to get people to view information about
9/11 that they normally wouldn't.
The issue isn't that people are pointing out that the interview is indeed fake, but what's been lost amongst the numerous threads on this subject,
is that it contained FACTS, but the level of anger now being shown towards Alex Jones and the actual fake interview, indirectly also makes those facts
fake, so the damage hasn't been done by Alex Jones for his stunt, it's done by those rushing to point out the article is fake, which in turn means
people won't even bother to read it, and that is an opportunity missed.