It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wormwood Squirm
I am a webmaster and I will point out that when that interview was posted AJ's web server was slammed immediately which caused a brief period of timeouts. It is possible that the disclaimer part of the article webpage was part of an "include". An include is a separate html or php file that could be used as a footer or menu or the like.
The purpose of includes is that you can change a single include and all pages on the site that have that include are changed in one move.
IMO it is possible that the article was uploaded, the server slammed and the footer changed and uploaded with a delay because of server slammage. In a court of law that would be enough of a defense as it is possible that the delay of the footer could of been unintentional and the result of the server timing out while the webmaster tried to upload the changes.
This is just a thought I wanted to shoot out there.
Originally posted by Wormwood Squirm
I am a webmaster and I will point out that when that interview was posted AJ's web server was slammed immediately which caused a brief period of timeouts. It is possible that the disclaimer part of the article webpage was part of an "include". An include is a separate html or php file that could be used as a footer or menu or the like...[edit for brevity].
IMO it is possible that the article was uploaded, the server slammed and the footer changed and uploaded with a delay because of server slammage.
In a court of law that would be enough of a defense as it is possible that the delay of the footer could of been unintentional and the result of the server timing out while the webmaster tried to upload the changes.
Originally posted by jimmyx
it's not the information in the faux interview that is being questioned, it's the way it was delivered.
there is enough of a problem trying to get this information re-investigated, by credible people, that would be risking reputations and possibly their lives if they take this on.
remember, people that want this reopened are in a constant fight against being called "tin-hatters", or "conspirecy nuts", so i agree with the ATS staff that alex jones created more of a problem with his hoax interview, than the actual good that would have come from it.
Originally posted by BlackOps719
Can I just point out one thing?
It is the duty of the one presenting the information to make it unquestionably clear that what he is saying is FALSE if it indeed is FALSE.
Originally posted by sayiamu
Did I hear right? that Alex reported today that he had received an inter-management memo from a "conspiricy based website" (a mole had sent it to him) ordering the attack of him and Sheen (or any kind of diversion) to quell any impact of what they had done....
if anyone that is not "in on it" ..... can read this ..... (I doubt they let anything out to very many that isnt approved)
does truth have no sanctuary?
Originally posted by EMPIRE
One man has thrown many into a frenzy. Why are you people so emotionally attached to all of this? Does AJ care about your bills? Did he help pay for your childrens medical? Is he putting money in your pocket for their college tuition? Is he putting clothes on your back? Is he making sure you're safe at night?
Originally posted by JustGetThere
All I have to say about Alex and his so called disclaimer mistake, never heard of a preview button.
I wrote and extensive article about it below
It's like the no-planers. They get far too much attention which could be more usefully employed elsewhere. It's also natural that they get MSM attention which is annoying... but it's counterproductive to rise to the bait.
But no, you're too hung up with feeling morally supoerior (spuriously, of course) to Alex Jones.
You've basically walked up to a car crash and set the car on fire, rather than get people out. All for the sake of your own ego.
[edit on 10-9-2009 by rich23]
Originally posted by rich23
Originally posted by EMPIRE
One man has thrown many into a frenzy. Why are you people so emotionally attached to all of this? Does AJ care about your bills? Did he help pay for your childrens medical? Is he putting money in your pocket for their college tuition? Is he putting clothes on your back? Is he making sure you're safe at night?
Easy now, back to bed, the nurse'll be along in a minute.
Nurse! He's wandered in from another thread. Can you take him back? Thanks.
Originally posted by payt69
If only people would be this 'infuriated' by all the lies told by governments, MSM, alphabethsoup agencies, history books etc..
Then again, maybe you're just not aware of those lies.. Maybe you swallow it all, hook line and sinker.. oe maybe you're so used to it, that you've accepted it?
I dunno.. but a lot of the critical stuff regarding towards AJ and Charlies letter comes off as hypocritical to me.