'Massive' ancient wall uncovered in Jerusalem, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times


reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 05:15 PM by Blackmarketeer
Wall is believed to have been built by Canaanites


Those crazy Canaanites again ... (see the
Baalbek topic)

Looking at the history of the peoples of the Levant and Judea, and the vicious wars among these various tribes, you can see how stone building techniques would expand. Wars are always good for pushing technology forward!


reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 05:35 PM by zazzafrazz
reply to post by Blackmarketeer



Now why would you go and bring common sence into this thread?
Of course using stone isnt a human technological ability.
Only ancient astronauts, who can bend time and space, would have requirement and ability for a stone wall....
Ghheeesh

Other posters, this is a fortification to protect a water source, a very human thing to do.
As we porgressed, people worked out it was easy to build with small brick, than lug large stones..human advancement....By the time we hit Rome and Byazntium, bricks were very thin

Roman brick, example... the process of not lugging, but 'firing' bricks is a advancement.


[edit on 4-9-2009 by zazzafrazz]


reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 05:50 PM by Blackmarketeer
reply to post by zazzafrazz



In this case, fortifying and protecting a water source, it would behoov the builders to use larger stones (4-5 tons as given in the article) as those best prevent sapper attacks.


reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 06:54 PM by punkinworks
reply to post by Picollo30



Because there is nothing to debunk, its an old caananite site, what is there to debunk.
We know that the caananites were there,and that jeruselum is a very very old site.
It wouldnt surprise me that people had been building walls around the springs in the area for 20,000 years or more.



reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 07:04 PM by randyvs
reply to post by zazzafrazz





the process of not lugging, but 'firing' bricks is a advancement.
i'm pretty sure when op said the on site pros. archeologists have no idea how it could have been built w/ out machinary. i think lugging, was probly the first thing, they we're ruling out. k?


reply posted on 4-9-2009 @ 07:23 PM by zazzafrazz
reply to post by randyvs



Not archaelogistS, one said that, perhaps to get some promotion to the find.
Lug, roll, drag, float, push...whatever, its the resource they had at the time to fortify.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 6 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 3 days ago with 80 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 14 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 3 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 15 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 10 days ago with 21 member flags