It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ghaleon12
I was thinking about this too, not an age requirement but at least having your age displayed under your name or something. I was young when I started on this website and I did fairly well. But age does make a difference in what a person will believe and what they won't. As far as gay rights discussions go, I swear there must have been some 13 year olds participating in which case I have no desire in participating myself. Those debates are already pretty fruitless and with young teens into the mix, God help us.
Originally posted by StevenDye
reply to post by mamabeth
I have to say, until recently, upon turning 16 and in some cases 17... my birthdate on websites was set in 1981.
Partly so people would listen to my opinion and not skip it by age alone, though I don't fear that would be too much of a problem here.
But mainly for security, I didn't want to broadcast to the internet that I was say 14... I learnt after putting my real age on one sight and getting message after message from people asking for my IM address etc. Once I set it to 1981, I was no longer bothered by such people.
Originally posted by DJDOHBOY
Age is but a number...
Some of our younger members can be the most intelligent of people,
Some more so than the Adults
They bring a fresh look at things, As for not arguing with children.. They are here and they no how things work and expect to be treated like any other member,
Also trying to induce a age limit would not really be something we could make work, they would just fib about there age,
IMO anyhow,
[edit on 1-9-2009 by DJDOHBOY]
Our Commitment To The Privacy Of Children:
Protecting the privacy of the very young is especially important. For that reason, we never collect or maintain information at our website from those we actually know are under 13, and no part of our website is structured to attract anyone under 13.
Originally posted by mamabeth
I ask this because of a thread I was on recently.I had a couple of exchanges
with another member,then discovered he was only 17 years old. I try to
make it a rule,not to argue with children.I will listen to a child,but I won't
argue with one.
Originally posted by Scooby Doo
Originally posted by mamabeth
I ask this because of a thread I was on recently.I had a couple of exchanges
with another member,then discovered he was only 17 years old. I try to
make it a rule,not to argue with children.I will listen to a child,but I won't
argue with one.
17 is not a child, it is a teenager. And I am pretty sure s/he is as smart as the rest of us to share a disussion at ATS.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
There could be a topic discussed on ATS with a potentially damaging psychological effect on children, such as alien abductions, MK ULTRA, FEMA camps or the drug war. Children could also be damaged by listening to people like Alex Jones, Michael Tsarion and Jordan Maxwell, who use an overly negative tone for their narratives, and are, for the most part, disinfo agents and scare mongers.
You'd need an expert to make the call on this one.
Originally posted by Chilled Zen
If you don't mind me asking why won't you argue with them? It promotes debating ability and the idea that others may have differing opinions.
I don't think age is a barrier to discussion.
Originally posted by mamabeth
I don't argue with children out of habit.