It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Family of Palestinian teen killed in 1992 tells Aftonbladet reporters IDF soldiers demanded NIS 5,000 to return his body and claimed stitches result of autopsy
Despite Israel's harsh protests, Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet published a second article accusing the IDF of harvesting Palestinian organs.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "We do not want the Swedish government to apologize, we want it to issue a condemnation."
In the article, published Sunday, Oisín Cantwell and Urban Andersson report from the northern West Bank village of Imatin, where 19-year-old Bilal Ahmad Ghanem was killed during a clash with Israeli soldiers in 1992.
The brother, who was 15-years-old at the time, recounted the shooting incident. "A number of (IDF) soldiers ambushed (the Palestinians) and opened fire. The fist shot hit (Bilal) in the chest, the second in the leg. We believe that he was still alive after sustaining the two bullet wounds."
The mother, Sadija, told Aftonbladet "they could have arrested him, but instead they decided to kill him.
According to the family, the IDF demanded NIS 5,000 (about $1,300) to return the body.
"It was the middle of the night. The soldiers caused an electrical power outage in the entire village. Bilal was returned in a black bag; he had no teeth. The body was stitched from the neck all the way down to the abdomen," the Swedish newspaper quoted the mother as saying.
According to the article, when asked what happened to the body, the soldiers said it had undergone an autopsy in Tel Aviv. The family, however, claims Bilal's organs had been stolen.
The Israeli government declared Sunday morning that it expects the Swedish government to officially condemn the first Aftonbladet report.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "We do not want the Swedish government to apologize, we want it to issue a condemnation."
On Thursday Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman slammed the Swedish Foreign Ministry for saying that Swedish Ambassador to Israel Elisabet Borsiin Bonnier's condemnation of the report does not represent the Swedish government's stance.
"It's a shame that the Swedish Foreign Ministry fails to intervene in a case of blood libels against Jews. This is reminiscent of Sweden's stand during World War II, when had failed to intervene as well," Lieberman said.
Originally posted by Chevalerous
So here we are! The Israeli Goverment want the Swedish Goverment to issue an official and public condemnation which is impossible by the Swedish Laws & Constitution.
The Goverment & Politicians are forbidden to step in to stop or interfere with the media & newspaper articles.
This is a part of the Swedish safe-guarding apparatus to prevent tyrants and wanna be despots or other un-democratic forces to interfere with the freedoms of the free press & freedom of expression.
And Israel of course know this!
So do they want the Swedish Goverment to change the Swedish constitution or what?
Something else is happening here!
Aftonbladet newspaper are the ones that should retract the article and give an apology if their first article is totally false - I agree with that.
But here we are with a SECOND article, a follow up on the same story and they don't seem to have the plans to retract or condemn any of what they have wrote so far!
So what the heck is going on?
I think there is also something else at work here!
www.ynetnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Chevalerous
"It's a shame that the Swedish Foreign Ministry fails to intervene in a case of blood libels against Jews. This is reminiscent of Sweden's stand during World War II, when had failed to intervene as well," Lieberman said.
I'd be interested to read what, in your opinion, a person being a socialist has to do with their views on 1 country occupying the territory of another in defiance of international law or agreements?
The newspaper publishing articles like the above is most probably coloured by Olof Palmes legacy and socialist red by colour of course.
Folke Bernadotte, Count of Wisborg (2 January 1895 – 17 September 1948) was a Swedish diplomat noted for his negotiation of the release of about 31,000 prisoners from German concentration camps during World War II. In 1945, he received a German surrender offer from Heinrich Himmler, though the offer was ultimately rejected.
Upon the initiative of the Norwegian diplomat Niels Christian Ditleff in the final months of the war, Bernadotte acted as the negotiator for a rescue operation transporting interned Norwegians, Danes and other western European inmates from German concentration camps to hospitals in Sweden.
The mission became known for its buses, painted entirely white except for the Red Cross emblem on the side, so that they would not be mistaken for military targets.
The missions took approximately two months, and exposed the Swedish Red Cross staff to significant danger, both due to political difficulties and by taking them through areas under Allied bombing.
After Germany's surrender, the White Buses mission continued in May and June to save approximately 10,000 additional people.
In total, around 31,000 people were taken to safety in the "White Buses" of the Bernadotte expedition, including between 6,500 and 11,000 Jews.
The newly-formed Israeli government banned the organization under an anti-terrorism law passed three days after its September 1948 assassination of the UN mediator Folke Bernadotte. The United Nations Security Council called the assassins "a criminal group of terrorists," and Lehi was similarly condemned by the subsequent United Nations mediator Ralph Bunche. The group never had more than a few hundred members. Future Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Shamir was among its leaders.
Raoul Wallenberg (August 4, 1912 – July 17, 1947?) was a Swedish humanitarian who worked in Budapest, Hungary, during World War II to rescue Jews from the Holocaust. Between July and December 1944, he issued protective passports and housed Jews, saving tens of thousands of Jewish lives.
On July 9, 1944, Wallenberg travelled to Budapest as the First Secretary to the Swedish legation in Budapest. Together with fellow Swedish diplomat Per Anger, he issued "protective passports" (German: Schutz-Pass), which identified the bearers as Swedish subjects awaiting repatriation and thus prevented their deportation. Although not legal, these documents looked official and were generally accepted by German and Hungarian authorities, who sometimes were also bribed. The Swedish legation in Budapest also succeeded in negotiating with the Germans so that the bearers of the protective passes would be treated as Swedish citizens and be exempt from having to wear the yellow Star of David on their chests.
He made news a few times. Once, in reaction to a call to boycott Israeli product, he stated that the Swedish Archbishop K. G. Hammar "probably is an anti-semite."
He has also been quoted as saying that Swedish foreign minister Anna Lindh's criticism of Israel's alleged human rights violations could not be tolerated.
Internationally, he is probably best known for vandalizing the artwork Snow White and The Madness of Truth in January 2004. The piece consisted of a boat floating in a rectangular basin filled with red water, signifying blood. The boat contained a card with a portrait of Palestinian suicide bomber Hanadi Jaradat on one side and the word "Snövit" ("Snow White" in Swedish) written on the other. The artwork was part of the exhibition Making Differences. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon later thanked Mazel and announced his support for Mazel's actions
A few days after the attack Mazel claimed that "There are daily agitations in Swedish media to kill Jews."
In a TV interview on 22 February 2004, Mazel called former foreign minister Sten Andersson and Sweden's UN ambassador Pierre Schori "professional anti-Israelis."
Originally posted by Bunken Drum
reply to post by reugenLet me get this straight. Are you suggesting that because a person may well have some views which are socialist in nature, that they will automatically fall in line with the opinion of a prominent socialist about issues which have nothing to do with political ideology but rather morality & law?
If so, do you think this is any more of an issue amongst socialists than say, religious people or monetarists?
Do you think that studying journalism might not actually inhibit such sheep-like following, especially for a free-lancer, whose reputation & thus future work would suffer greatly if they were to be shown to have merely adopted a stance out of loyalty rather than because that's what their research suggested?
Well, that sounds like you are indeed saying what I posted earlier, that an alleged socialist would follow an opinion about morality & law from another socialist without regard to their own research. Except that in this case, the reporter did do his own research, on site talking to the people who made the allegations, who did lose family members, @least 1 photo of whom, showing the cadaver cut up, exists & who are willing to have the bodies exhumed for examination. We also know that there is an international trade in illegally obtained organs & that Israeli citizens have been involved in it before.
I am saying, until we know for a fact that Israel is harvesting organs, its all speculation but the swedish socialist newspaper jumped the gun. Its in their interest to do so becasue they have always disliked Israel and the imperalistic USA etc. The views expressed in the newspaper is coloured by politics and ideology and it dates back to the 60s.
Originally posted by SpacePunk
Seems to me that the only way to settle is would be to exhume the body, and do an autopsy to determine if the organs are there are not. That would expose either Israelis as liars, and the Palestinians as liars. It's abhorrent enough that the families must pay to get the bodies.
Originally posted by FredT
Couple of things here:
Fisrt off organ donation does not work that way. Im sorry it does not. The person donating the organs actually has to be in decent shape. Gunshot wounds to the chest pretty much precludes organs from being harvested.
Also you cannot just plug organs into people. It takes time to type the donor get the recipents into hospitals etc.
I am no fan of the the way the IDF conducts itself but I doubt they are charging for the return of bodies. Im betting if true its the act of a few rogue people as opposed to official policy IMHO.
The bottom line here is that this is long on speculation and conjecture and short on reality and facts.