posted on Aug, 6 2009 @ 03:27 PM
Originally posted by operation mindcrime
All nice and dandy but what if the OP of a thread refuses to respond to questions which might undermine the thread itself....
Now all through out this thread from page 1 it was pointed out that the information she provided was inaccurate......no respons because it was clearly
I usually consider it as their way of conceding that they were wrong, but just don't want to admit it.
Now i plea guilty to creating two threads last month in respons to a certain members thread who never seems to care to much for argumentation opposing
I would just present my ideas/facts or whatnot in their thread, if they want to read it and respond, fine, if they don't, that's also fine.
I wouldn't waste my time starting a whole other thread just hoping this "member who never seems to reply" might respond to the new thread.
I always look at like this, if a member never responds to a post from you against their beliefs or "facts", it's either because they are conceding
your right, or they just believe "they" are right and there's no changing their minds, and they don't even want to listen/reply to any opposing
So like I said earlier, why waste your time starting another thread just to oppose their views?