It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Complaint to the State Bar of California
IN RE: ORLY TAITZ
STATE BAR NO. 223433
Office of the Chief Trial Counsel/Intake
The State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles, California 90015-2299
A California attorney has decided that President Obama is ineligible to be president, and has taken on the mission of removing him from office -- by force, if necessary. On at least two occasions, she has openly called for armed rebellion by the military, to arrest and imprison the elected President.
Her name is Orly Taitz. Using the power of the Internet, including blogs, online radio and television shows, and YouTube, she has become the national leader of a fringe movement. She has literally thousands of followers who think she is waging a lonely battle to uphold the Constitution, in the face of a conspiracy to place a usurper in the White House. Because her cause is so important, she has ignored the laws of the United States, established court procedures, and specifically, the California Rules of Professional Conduct. Specific violations are alleged below.
Originally posted by fraterormus
Wait, this is the woman who is a dentist, lawyer, financial broker, real-estate agent and Taekwondo black-belt instructor?
Is this same woman who got her legal degree from a diploma mill via correspondence and somehow passed the State of California Legal Bar Examine from listening to Legal Books on Tape while driving her kid to soccer practice?
Is this the same woman that John Stewart refers to as the "Lost Gabor Sister" or "Your One-Stop Shop for All Things Tooth, Legal, and Shelter Related”?
OMG! It all of a sudden makes perfect sense now!
(I bet she forged her Legal Degree just as she forged the Kenyan Birth Certificate...someone might want to check her Broker and Real-Estate licenses as well.)
By openly advocating armed revolt, accusing virtually the entire federal government of treason, and using poisonous invective against President Obama, she is making it significantly more likely that someone will attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. I recognize that, however distasteful, many of her actions are likely protected by the First Amendment. However, in her capacity as a California attorney, she has violated numerous Rules of Professional Conduct, as detailed below.
Originally posted by deadline527
I fail to see how she gained her knowledge as being a means of discrediting her.