It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO Formation

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 11:33 AM
link   
Here's the story that came with the photo:

I was in the back yard enjoying the rare sun and taking photos of my dogs. I glanced over towards the trees and saw these two objects moving towards the west at the apparent speed of low flying jets. I was able to get my camera up and take one photo before they disappeared behind the trees. The objects were silent or at least quiet enough that I couldn't hear them from the ground. We live in a very rural area and the only low flying aircraft I normally see are the rare medivac or news helicopters. Occasionally I'll see military helicopters in formation which I assume are National Guard headed to or from Buffalo. I still don't know what they were but they don't look like any other aircraft I've ever seen.

And here's the photo:

i16.photobucket.com...


So, should he call the National Enquirer? Should I?




posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 11:48 AM
link   
Went behind the trees.
So they went in the direction of their 'head lights'.

In the Tesla UFO theory the lights would be around the Tesla 'bulb'.
Which is nothing more than a current intake channel.

Some might think so but the jury is still out if Obama will privatize
the UFO industry.

So we must only theorize.



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 12:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Wasco
 



Interesting. What time did you snap that? In NY?



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 12:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Electro38
reply to post by Wasco
 



Interesting. What time did you snap that? In NY?


About 9:00 AM this morning. Yes.

Why did you ask in NY? Do you know someone who saw the same thing?



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 01:59 PM
link   
They remind me of a pic I saw on another thread a few days ago, I'll see if I can find it.

2nd line

[edit on 1-8-2009 by bigern]



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:11 PM
link   
I'm sure those two objects were snapped in New Mexico just a day or two back.

If the photo's are by different witnesses that would be very interesting, S&F



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Wasco
 



Here's the story that came with the photo:


where did you get the story ?






this is a crop of the picture in your Op





this is a crop from a different picture that was recently posted on the Coast to Coast A.M. website



www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:25 PM
link   
EDIT TO ADD:..........Nevermind, seeing as this is a hoax from you anyways. Man I HAVE to stop giving people the benefit of the doubt.



[edit on 8/1/2009 by jkrog08]



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:29 PM
link   
That looks like the exact same image in reverse, with tree tips. Hmm.



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:30 PM
link   
Edited because I changed my mind.

[edit on 8/1/2009 by gemineye]



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:31 PM
link   
reply to post by fleabit
 


Yea, I thought the same thing....

We need a larger picture with background reference.



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:40 PM
link   
reply to post by jkrog08
 


The pictures are different, However the craft in relationship to each other may be a negative copy and paste type of effect onto different backgrounds.

Be interested to see what the experts think.



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:41 PM
link   
reply to post by fleabit
 


You're right, fleabit.

New Mexico pic:



OP's pic, cropped and flipped:





[edit on 8/1/2009 by gemineye]



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:42 PM
link   
Okay, mea culpa, before this goes much further I have to confess. The UFOs came from a photo posted on the MUFON forum. In that photo the UFOs were obvously cut and pasted. I wanted to create a photo where they were less obviously added to the scene. The story is fiction. Mylar balloons does sound like a reasonable explanation for what they are. I have no idea where the UFO images originally came from. Sorry to deceive but I'm still interested in technial critiques of the photo.



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:44 PM
link   
reply to post by easynow
 


BRAVO easynow.
C2C pics EXIF data were missing while this one DOES have EXIF data.
To the op:
This is a 28% crop of the 2,816 × 600 (1.7 megapixel) original one: would you like to share the original one?
Ah, the exif data says that the photo was taken 3 hours, 44 minutes, 11 seconds ago: how comes that it was posted on C2C days ago: did you learn how to use EXIF tool?


[edit on 1/8/2009 by internos]



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Wasco
 


Your kidding right? Why in the hell would you do this? Could you not add to the already existing thread?



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:47 PM
link   
reply to post by internos
 



Okay, mea culpa, before this goes much further I have to confess. The UFOs came from a photo posted on the MUFON forum. In that photo the UFOs were obvously cut and pasted. I wanted to create a photo where they were less obviously added to the scene. The story is fiction. Mylar balloons does sound like a reasonable explanation for what they are. I have no idea where the UFO images originally came from. Sorry to deceive but I'm still interested in technial critiques of the photo.



And we have the confession....



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wasco
Sorry to deceive but I'm still interested in technial critiques of the photo.

The technical critique is that you have tried to hoax the forum and should be banned right away in my opinion, dunno what the others think.



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 02:51 PM
link   
reply to post by jkrog08
 


Eh, we were typing at the same time.



posted on Aug, 1 2009 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by internos
 





i cannot believe somebody would waste their time doing this to us


Wasco



Wasco has been banned



















[edit on 1-8-2009 by easynow]



new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join