Poor debunker illogical generalisations - why?, page 24
Pages: <<  21    22    23    24  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 21 times


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 12:47 AM by impressme
reply to post by jthomas





Since I deal in evidence, you have never refuted one piece of it. In 8 full years.


What evidences?


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 12:58 AM by impressme
reply to post by jthomas



Your desperation, misrepresentations, and intellectual dishonesty are now well known, Lillydale. You are foolish to pretend you can fool anyone.


Jthomas what you are accusing Lillydale is false however, it is you who dose all of the above and you are not fooling anyone.

This tread topic is the find example of your behavior you need to take a step back and have a good look at what you are doing here because, no one is agreeing with you on anything. You are alone on this one, and your ridiculing is what turning everyone away from you.

I think you need to rethink things here and try a different approach.



reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 03:34 PM by jthomas
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by jthomas
Your desperation, misrepresentations, and intellectual dishonesty are now well known, Lillydale. You are foolish to pretend you can fool anyone.

Now, once again, either tell us how you know "there were no passengers bodies at the crash," or withdraw your claim.

Enough of your evasions. Answer the question.


Are you admitting that you have not been paying attention? You admitting that you already forgot my explanation to this exact question here?


Show me. I want to see you explain how you know there were no passenger bodies at the Pentagon.


They place was not built with passengers bodies inside was it?


What part of your statement, "crash scene" confuses you? You're just making a fool of yourself. Your claim is clear as a bell:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

You made a direct, positive claim of evidence that "there were no passengers bodies at the crash scene. " What do you think a "crash scene" is anyway?

How do you know? Demonstrate how you know and what you know. It's easy if you have the knowledge.

Let's see if you will finally provide evidence for your claim, Lillydale. Your evasions are really childish. You're just showing that once you've painted yourself into a corner you are unwilling to be intellectually honest.

Now, either support your claim or simply retract it and admit that you cannot demonstrate that "there were no passengers bodies at the crash scene". If you think you are convincing anyone that AA77 did NOT hit the Pentagon, you're really off this planet.




[edit on 21-9-2009 by jthomas]


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 03:41 PM by jthomas
Originally posted by impressme
reply to
post by jthomas



Your desperation, misrepresentations, and intellectual dishonesty are now well known, Lillydale. You are foolish to pretend you can fool anyone.


Jthomas what you are accusing Lillydale is false however,


No, she actually made the claim. How could you not know that by now?

Right here: www.abovetopsecret.com...

Let me know if you're still confused about what she claims but for which she refuses to provide evidence.


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 03:47 PM by jthomas
Originally posted by impressme
reply to
post by jthomas





Since I deal in evidence, you have never refuted one piece of it. In 8 full years.


What evidences?


Too bad you can't see this since you have blinders on. But I've repeatedly given everyone a source with plenty of evidence for you all to refute:

wtc7lies.googlepages.com...

No one here has yet had the courage to even attempt to refute all that. But they are happy to howl at the moon that "there is no evidence!"

Amazing denial these 9/11 Twoofers engage in.



reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 05:39 PM by Lillydale
Originally posted by jthomas
Too bad you can't see this since you have blinders on. But I've repeatedly given everyone a source with plenty of evidence for you all to refute:

wtc7lies.googlepages.com...

No one here has yet had the courage to even attempt to refute all that. But they are happy to howl at the moon that "there is no evidence!"

Amazing denial these 9/11 Twoofers engage in.




Your page has been smacked down in every thread you tried it in. Have another? There is no evidence in there of passenger bodies, just 2 people saying they saw some. Where is that in the coroner's report? How is it that your poorly made website happens to have the only 2 people that saw bodies strapped into seats and yet, the coroner did not? Your link is a lie.

[edit on 21-9-2009 by Lillydale]


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 06:44 AM by jthomas
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by jthomas
Too bad you can't see this since you have blinders on. But I've repeatedly given everyone a source with plenty of evidence for you all to refute:

wtc7lies.googlepages.com...

No one here has yet had the courage to even attempt to refute all that. But they are happy to howl at the moon that "there is no evidence!"

Amazing denial these 9/11 Twoofers engage in.




Your page has been smacked down in every thread you tried it in. Have another? There is no evidence in there of passenger bodies, just 2 people saying they saw some. Where is that in the coroner's report? How is it that your poorly made website happens to have the only 2 people that saw bodies strapped into seats and yet, the coroner did not? Your link is a lie.

[edit on 21-9-2009 by Lillydale]


Where is your refutation of the evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon?

You know, the Boeing 757 that contained the passengers, crew, and hijackers?

We're waiting.


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 08:35 PM by tezzajw
reply to post by jthomas


jthomas, you're still bumping my thread and scoring me points with your canard about the preponderance of evidence... why?

You've already proven that you don't know where you stand with regards to the Pentagon. You refuse to endorse the Pentagon Security Images, despite your belief in the official government story.

[edit on 22-9-2009 by tezzajw]


reply posted on 23-9-2009 @ 01:21 AM by impressme
reply to post by jthomas



wtc7lies.googlepages.com...

No wonder you are so uninformed you are reading your info from a disinformation website.
You need to find better reading material than disinformationist websites who want their readers to believe in proven lies.
Pages: <<  21    22    23    24  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 11 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 3 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 13 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 7 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 15 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags