Not too surprised in one sense then on the other hand am surprised at the same time.
1. Not too surprised as when elections come up if it fails right out of the gate you want to be able to say you voted against it and assume that the
rest of the clan will vote it in.
2. If it succeeds then you can say oh yes we the "democrats" or "I was one of the few republicans to..."
What surprises me is sense when do these people care what the voters think? Look at Tom Daschle, SD votes him out when he looked to be in the prime
of his career (which was a wise decision for SD at the time) but he never leaves Washington, just gets himself appointed somewhere else by his
buddies. So I'm surprised they may actually care about what the voters think but I guess the jury is still out on that one.
I say down with the bill as it's just poo poo after reading some of it. Will cause more problems than it fixes in the end. Although I do agree with
making each procedure a fixed cost so your insurance company can't be charged up the ying yang and cause rates to raise, I still think it's better
left out of govt. hands if this bill is our only option.
Heck if a hospital has amazing Dr.'s that do great work go ahead and charge me for their great work then. I'd rather go once and get properly
diagnosed than go 10 times and get no diagnosis and still be paying the same price in the end.



