Originally posted by spearhead
you should all be happy the government cares enough to vaccinate you.
you are a threat to society if you are not vaccinated against contagious diseases. why should other people be put at risk because a few paranoids
refuse to submit because of their insecurities.
pull your finger out and realise everyone is despensable for the good of the nation when it comes to risks involved with vaccination.
The vaccine hasn't been tested. If it's okay to distribute stuff without being tested then why have testing? We could save a lot of money by just
getting rid of tests on everything right?
But we don't because that's a risk right? So when is it okay to be a risk and when is it not?
What if the vaccine causes some other disease? That would make the government and the vaccine they're administering a risk as well correct?
How come I'm not allowed to be a risk to society but the government is allowed to be a risk to me? Don't I have a right to be a risk to someone and
if not then how can the government have the right to use an untested vaccine?
If you have no right to be a risk to society then wouldn't we have to make driving illegal and shut down all factories? Cars cause accidents and both
automobiles and factories release pollutants into the air. How come I can risk someone else's life by driving down the road? Because I have insurance
right? Well why doesn't someone just sell insurance to the people that don't want to be vaccinated? Wouldn't that work? Or should we ban driving if
we have no right to risk doing something that might cause someone else harm.
According to your logic how would you logically even be able to leave the house? Simply stepping outside would be a risk to society would it not? I
mean you never know what can happen right?
Do you think the government knows better than the people? The government is ran by people. If people are dumb then the government is dumb. And in fact
the government gets it wrong all the time.
Damaging someone's body with a needle against their will is assault. Can I stick you with a needle and inject you with whatever I want and it's
okay? No? But it's okay for the government to do so right?
Why? Shouldn't the vaccine be tested?
You do know they're injecting children first right? That's beyond crazy. If the vaccine is untested it should be used on adults and the elderly and
people willing to go first to make sure it's safe for the children FIRST.
Would you really want your kids to be the guinea pigs? When EVER have we let the kids go first in the testing of anything?
So let me get this straight. You think it's okay to assault someone with a needle and untested vaccine for the greater good, but you don't have a
right to be a risk to soceity? How can you assult someone without being a risk to them?
Your logic contradicts very badly.
[edit on 25-7-2009 by tinfoilman]