It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We can see the mars rover at less than 10 feet wide and its tracks and mast.... in full color...
Originally posted by Phage
There's a lot of stuff packed on that little bugger:
Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER)
Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment (DIVINER)
Lyman-Alpha Mapping Project (LAMP)
Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector (LEND)
The Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA)
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC)
Mini-RF is a technology demonstration of an advanced single aperture radar (SAR)
www.planetary.org...
Taking pictures is really a small part of the mission.
Originally posted by Baracas
We can see the mars rover at less than 10 feet wide and its tracks and mast.... in full color... (marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov...) C'Mon , but this is all we get of the landing sites from a billion dollar high def camera
Originally posted by weedwhacker.the LROC isn't really designed to take photos asits primary mission.
Originally posted by jra
Oh and the LRO itself doesn't even cost one billion, let alone the camera...
Originally posted by jfj123Don't listen to the "non-believers", have FAITH that you are right and dismiss all the evidence that you are not as it will interfere with your faith
Originally posted by Baracas
Interesting they still haven't completely "re-deveoped" the technology to go there and actually protect living tissue... or have they???
Originally posted by jfj123
Originally posted by Baracas
Interesting they still haven't completely "re-deveoped" the technology to go there and actually protect living tissue... or have they???
The long and short of it is that going to the moon in the 60's was FANTASTICALLY dangerous. As a matter of fact, there was a 50 % chance that once they landed on the moon, they'd take off again.
Those types of safety factors would simply not fly today and that is why things are taking longer then the original missions.
Before it was a race at any cost. Now it's safety first.
Hopefully that clarifies things.
[edit on 20-7-2009 by jfj123]
Originally posted by jfj123
Before it was a race at any cost. Now it's safety first.
ust last week, NASA sent out an email to those involved in the project, asking them to destroy any data that they had on hand. Some people believe that it's because NASA wants to make sure they are sitting on all of the data themselves and no one else has it out there.
NASA has stated that the information is sensitive, it could hurt the airlines and it could undermine the confidence of the flying public. There are some in NASA who believe they may still be preparing a report on all of this data, but NASA officials have yet to confirm this.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by jfj123
Before it was a race at any cost. Now it's safety first.
The latest launch of the shuttle delayed three time with serious fuel leaks.
And you want to trust these bozo's with space travel for all mankind?
Originally posted by Baracas
These Apollo images are NASA Bulls**T!!! We can see the mars rover at less than 10 feet wide and its tracks and mast.... in full color... (marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov...) C'Mon , but this is all we get of the landing sites from a billion dollar high def camera.... Lies Lies Lies!!!!
you wont ever see them until ground scopes can digitally image them in high def...
Originally posted by jfj123
As a matter of fact, there was a 50 % chance that once they landed on the moon, they'd take off again.
Originally posted by jfj123
Who do you suggest we trust? The reptilians ???
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Originally posted by jfj123
As a matter of fact, there was a 50 % chance that once they landed on the moon, they'd take off again.
So NASA flipped a coin and it came up heads seven times in a row...
But then again, NASA does make their own luck own in the desert.
Originally posted by jfj123
Obviously you believe that nobody ever landed on the moon.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Originally posted by jfj123
Obviously you believe that nobody ever landed on the moon.
Where do I state that I "believe that nobody ever landed on the moon"?
Surely you would be able to find such a statement - if it existed...
But then again, NASA does make their own luck own in the desert.