It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TurkeyBurgers
The problem with the way you are looking at the SETI search OP is you are bringing BIAS that would contaminate the experiment.
You are already going into the experiment knowing that life elsewhere exists.
You just screwed the experiment.
You brought your BIAS on board.
Check that at the door before you come into the SETI experiment.
Go into the SETI search as looking for life without the BIAS of life existing. Searching for alien life. Not because you personally think it exists and are out to prove it. Your data will be corrupt and you will not have a substantiated claim if you do find results.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by 2shores
Everything can be prooved even cheese has intelligence can be proved, we just need to find the "facts" that say so, for the masses to catch on.
OK -- Do it.
Originally posted by hermantinkly
Modern scientists are extremely arrogant I would say. They won't look at anything that falls outside their restricted understanding of things. Anything that can't be perceived with their five human senses just cannot exist according to modern scientists...
Originally posted by 2shores...Imagination, is much more important than knowledge. Without imagination, we wouldn't look for knowledge to support it...
Originally posted by 2shores
Then if knowledge existed before science, what do we call that? Word-of mouth advertisment?
What happens when science has the only strangle-hold/authority on knowledge...? That is a form of Tyranny in my opinion.
What is tyranny?
Originally posted by 2shores
What happens when science has the only strangle-hold/authority on knowledge...? That is a form of Tyranny in my opinion.
Originally posted by SmallManGeorge
I think scientists are arrogant to a degree yes.
IMO many scientists are quick to dismiss any unexplained phenomena, disregarding any information whatsoever about them. I think many scientists are afraid of these phenomena being real, as it would change the scientific landscape in such a big way. I do understand though that scientists do have to be 100% sure about something before it's classed as something real.
Originally posted by TurkeyBurgers
I was referring to the present.