Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by trebor451
Intellectually dishonest.
Admitting the acceptance of two mutually exclusive events.
In your 25 years of working for the DOD, did they ever teach you to think outside the box, trebor? It appears not. For someone who wasn't there, you're sure trying to force an opinion based on what you've been told happened.
You and jthomas both cherry-pick Boger's witness statement to suit yourselves. You both do the exact same thing that you accuse 'truthers' of doing.
Originally posted by trebor451
So. Let's try again on a different topic.
Who are the fly-over witnesses?
You need to keep up with current events, trebor. Maybe those long days working with the DOD don't allow you the time to refresh threads, like you should. Unless you only refresh the threads that you're allowed to refresh?
jthomas has already admitted that no one knows how many witnesses there were or what they would have seen, with respect to a flyover.
You were already nailed on that, tezzajw, since you know full well what I actually wrote versus what you claim I wrote. Repeating your deceit doesn't change the facts, as desperate as you are trying.
Everyone now understands your intellectual dishonesty. Flailing helplessly doesn't help you.
Now, let's be clear. ALL of the evidence from multiple independent sources converges on the inescapable conclusion that AA77 hit the Pentagon. No one has provided evidence that can refute ALL of the evidence. Either do so or admit you can't. The burden of proof still rests on the ones claiming AA77 didn't.
[edit on 16-7-2009 by jthomas]
