It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Debunking Creation

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 05:28 PM
link   
Why are we here?

Our existence was needed to overcome our non-existence.
When something need to exist, it does.

Both come to reality ultimatly, since non-existence exists even has a form of nothingless.

Existence and non-existence both reside within Eternity, because Eternity beares with both.

So you can say that Existence was an act of Love against non-existence.

Eternity felt lonely.

(My Guardian told me this on a dream.)




[edit on 10-7-2009 by AKNOWLEGE_ME]




posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 05:32 PM
link   
reply to post by AKNOWLEGE_ME
 





Our existence was needed to overcome our non-existence.
When something need to exist, it does.


What? How does this debunk creation, it seems like you are for it? Evolution and Creationism both teach a lot of the same things and both have a creator (One being a single cell and the other being a single deity). So what is this? You want us to debunk your creation theory or something. I am confused. Please, explain better. If I sound rude, I do not mean to me, its just that you lost me and I am trying to figure out what you asked or said.



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 05:34 PM
link   
reply to post by TheMythLives
 


Because it was the Creation of existence.
Single deity was, is, will be Eternity.

(sorry im not native, not really sure if deity is what i think.)

[edit on 10-7-2009 by AKNOWLEGE_ME]



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by AKNOWLEGE_ME
 


So how is this debunking creation if your theory is a way of creation? Perhaps a title change?



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 05:38 PM
link   
reply to post by TheMythLives
 


No I think this is correct



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 05:41 PM
link   
reply to post by AKNOWLEGE_ME
 


No I am pretty sure its wrong, respectfully, you stated this:




Because it was the Creation of existence


So you BELIEVE in Creation?

The title says DEBUNKING, which means to prove false. How are you debunking if you believe it or do you want us to debunk your theory?



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 05:43 PM
link   
reply to post by TheMythLives
 


Because i cannot induce my beliefs into others.
I'm a very humble person.
Me, so tiny.

[edit on 10-7-2009 by AKNOWLEGE_ME]



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 06:09 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 06:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by AKNOWLEGE_ME
reply to post by TheMythLives
 


Because i cannot induce my beliefs into others.
I'm a very humble person.
Me, so tiny.


Tiny, but sacred as is all life.
However, try not to lay-on the humble sauce so thick. In that way, it can indicate exactly the opposite.



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 06:19 PM
link   
reply to post by EnlightenUp
 


Ego. I see.
But you see i don't have to offer worship, i work in cooporation with IT. Because all is one.
I can still try to be cool
.

[edit on 10-7-2009 by AKNOWLEGE_ME]



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 06:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by AKNOWLEGE_ME
reply to post by TheMythLives
 


Because i cannot induce my beliefs into others.

[edit on 10-7-2009 by AKNOWLEGE_ME]


Isn't that exactly what you created this thread for?

 


removed off topic comment

[edit on 10/7/09 by masqua]



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 06:32 PM
link   
reply to post by breakingdradles
 


Neigther. I worked on this theory in my mind.



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 06:33 PM
link   
reply to post by AKNOWLEGE_ME
 


I'm still confused. What are you saying? Debunking your theory? or something else. Explain it please.



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 06:34 PM
link   
reply to post by TheMythLives
 


I'm presenting it to you.



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 06:35 PM
link   
reply to post by AKNOWLEGE_ME
 


lol... I will not entertain your trolling thread. Have fun
Also your title is misleading and your theory is mistaken



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 06:45 PM
link   


lol... I will not entertain your trolling thread. Have fun Also your title is misleading and your theory is mistaken
reply to post by TheMythLives
 


Truth paradox.



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 06:56 PM
link   
reply to post by AKNOWLEGE_ME
 


Oh by the way, thats nothing.
I have created a Space Dwelling Being based on this laws:


It is the sum of Natural Law which under RANDOM MIXING of Matter and Energy from different or opposite directions of the solid geometry space, begin to create Organic Aggregates of Matter and Energy through dipoles of counter rotating spirals. The Principle of the above phenomena are point based and the continuation is continued expanding with Phenomena End of Space Expanding, the natural limits of radiation of maximum width-length capable to be produced by the initial spontaneous point collision of two dodecahedral move-less particles in Space. At the End Conclusion of the Phenomena it is created in Space the Supreme Environmental Intelligent Being into which at the Same-time and Same-Space with its Expansion, are created Beings that act as its cells. The Supreme Environmental Being COMPULSORY in his contains is made of Beings Cells (Stellar Systems Fauna Flora of all the matter rarifications of initial move-less particles that fall into moving fluctuation) as is compelled by the Natural Laws. Meaning the Quantity and the Species of the contents Beings inside the Supreme, are COMPULSORY and INVOLUNTARY and INDEPENDENT of the WILL of the Supreme Being. Under this exact term, the contents Beings doesnt have to offer worship or obedience to the Supreme Being that contains them, but they have to cooperate with him into Organic Co-existence, exactly as the Cells of the Human Organism have to cooperate with the Totality of the Body without temples, religions, dogma, rituals, functions, mysteries, initiations, mysticism, and apocalyptic holy books or visions or miracles, all used in order to support the nonexistent Extra-universal Logos.




I'm already breaking trough reality.

 

Edit for pontuations.

Added 'ex' tags for external material

[edit on 10/7/09 by masqua]

[edit on 10-7-2009 by AKNOWLEGE_ME]



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 08:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheMythLives
reply to post by AKNOWLEGE_ME
 


No I am pretty sure its wrong, respectfully, you stated this:




Because it was the Creation of existence


So you BELIEVE in Creation?

The title says DEBUNKING, which means to prove false. How are you debunking if you believe it or do you want us to debunk your theory?


Perhaps he means to debunk creation in the Biblical sense? What he is saying is quite familiar but resembles occult mysticism more than exoteric creationism. In fact, it sounds a bit like The Arcane Teaching as I recall it if I were to give a particular source that readily pops into my head-- at least the OP itself.

[edit on 7/10/2009 by EnlightenUp]



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 08:13 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 08:22 PM
link   
reply to post by The_Tick
 





Wow this thread is a wast of time!


It is a process.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join