It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JennyJen
JC ~ I think I would faint before I got near enough to check the outfit for a 'Made in China' label.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by tarifa37
“I believe the objects that I saw at close quarters were extra-terrestrial in origin.”
Take note, please, that all this quote reveals is that he saw a device and he did not recognise it as built-here That's not the same as knowing it was extraterrestrial in origin.
Originally posted by Nohup
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by tarifa37
“I believe the objects that I saw at close quarters were extra-terrestrial in origin.”
Take note, please, that all this quote reveals is that he saw a device and he did not recognise it as built-here That's not the same as knowing it was extraterrestrial in origin.
That's right. The two key words in his statement are "I believe." He can believe it was made by leprechauns, too, but that don't make it true.
Originally posted by alienesque he said it was manufactured and intelligently controlled...what possibilities does that leave us with?
man made craft..meaning we are being lied to regarding energy technologies
alien...meaning we are being lied to regarding...ermm...aliens..
either one gets my interest
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts Folks, it is far past time to hook our brains back up and take this to the next level.
Meh.. you can dismiss it all if you like......
....but I am also tired of people treating other humans as ignorant morons who cant' tell the difference between something flying over their heads, and a lighthouse some 20 miles away or whatever it was.
Even though I'd guess, that lighthouse was well known to them. The thing was right in front of them.
Of course, as usual, I'm sure they are all lying as well as idiots, because of all the fame and fortune it's gotten them. wait...
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
Originally posted by fleabit
Meh.. you can dismiss it all if you like......
Hey, I didn't dismiss this case without REALLY looking into it and using my brain. That puts me far and above the group I think you are trying to lump me into.
....but I am also tired of people treating other humans as ignorant morons who cant' tell the difference between something flying over their heads, and a lighthouse some 20 miles away or whatever it was.
First and foremost, if I came across calling them ignorant morons, I should have made a better point to just call them ignorant (which doesn't mean stupid, moron of buffoon, just that they have a lack of knowledge). However, taking the word of some very young service men recounting something years and years later (while often disagreeing with each others accounts) on faith that you want to believe alone is doing a discredit to this subject, and I know you better than that, that's why your one of my trusted friends. Lighthouse?
Let's listen to the recording of the guys seeing the light, then superimpose a beep representing every time the lighthouse would shine in their direction. WOW, it is DEAD ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To ignore that evidence in light of taking the word of some exited guys years later is, in my opinion, ignorant.
Even though I'd guess, that lighthouse was well known to them. The thing was right in front of them.
Their accounts has them mixed up on their direction at first, now knowing where they were facing at first. Ever happen to you in the woods..sure it has. And to make believe that THESE KIDS were HIGHLY trained SUPER SOLDIERS who are far and above fault is not really understanding the average 3rd shift military guard mentality at a base where there were very few incidents that EVER required their attention. So when something even remotely "fun" happens they are more than happy to over act, misidentify and misconstrue what was happening in the name of "something to do".
Of course, as usual, I'm sure they are all lying as well as idiots, because of all the fame and fortune it's gotten them. wait...
You have not looked at the facts of this case by yourself, without the internet filter of conspiracy guiding your way, so it does not surprise me that you take this position, but as I pointed out above that is the problem with this subject.
Are they idiots? Maybe, maybe not. But are they ignorant. YES. The "radiation" they reported was using a meter that couldn't give them crap for answers because it was not the right scale to determine the levels were the least bit unusual. In fact, the readings should be thrown out because the were inaccurate, caused by the users being too ignorant to understand what they were trying to measure. Simple as that.
There are TONS of things that are as "simple as that" about this case. Viewed independently they pretty much tear this thing up, viewed as a group they make this case a joke. Simple as that.
Go ahead, look into this for yourself and if you don't come to the same conclusions as I have I'll eat my hat.
And SERIOUSLY, if you are that subscribed to things like this, give the audio link I posted 10 minutes of your life. Especially the part about the lighthouse. It is almost sad when you hear it, as it will dispel the majority of the utter tripe you read about this case on the internet.
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
I can imagine that most will not let the light of common sense, reason and logic shine on one of the "commandments" of the religion of Ufology. But if you can disconnect your belief system, and step back from the ever "evolving" accounts of "those that were there", we might be able to move past idiotic cases like this, and show those that are involved and purposely push things like this on the public that yes we do have a brain, and we are no longer going to blindly discuss such none-sense unless they present the FACTS that some of us went out of our way to discover.
Noticeably missing from cases like this, presented by those that do so, are the majority of the things that seem to discredit or leave doubt in the observer's or readers mind. Wonder why that is?
Ufology is dead. Cases like Roswell and Redelsham along with the loudest voice of Ufology on the internet have "baptized" an entire generation of those interested in this subject and it prevents them from questioning openly one of their sacred cows.
Hate me for saying this, call me an ignorant skeptic, but then continue along the path your on and lets talk in the next 20 years to see if this subject has made any movement based off of the worship of cases like this and others.
Folks, it is far past time to hook our brains back up and take this to the next level.
Originally posted by jdm2104
I hope we hear more information about this from other sources. It bothers me that the story comes from the Daily Star!
Just noticed he was part of "out of the blue":
[edit on 9-7-2009 by jdm2104]
[edit on 9-7-2009 by jdm2104]
Originally posted by fls13
reply to post by tarifa37
Hasn't this been his position for years? Sure it has. Just like Edgar Mitchell's spring appearance at the Nat'l Press Club. He didn't say anything there he hasn't been saying for years. I certainly don't blame Halt or Mitchell, they've been consistent. The media spins this as if it's a new revelation. Bad media!
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by tarifa37
Former Deputy Base Commander Col Charles Halt said “extra-terrestrials” caused the close encounter in Suffolk.... “The UFOs I saw were structured machines moving under intelligent control and operating beyond the realm of anything I have ever seen before or since.
“I believe the objects that I saw at close quarters were extra-terrestrial in origin.”
Take note, please, that all this quote reveals is that he saw a device and he did not recognise it as built-here
That's not the same as knowing it was extraterrestrial in origin.
Originally posted by Schaden
If it was only the lighthouse they saw, why wouldn't that be obvious on subsequent nights in the woods ?