It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What about all the samples that were brought back? Especially the larger rocks that could not have been collected by an unmanned probe. I think the 800lbs of Lunar samples makes for some very solid evidence that we've been there.
I did wonder about this myself a while back but in the end came to the conclusion that this didnt prove anything at all. Bits of the moon have been hitting the earth from time to time...
Thirdly, again anything from another World that lands on Earth will exhibit signs of the re-entry through the atmosphere...and the incredible heating that results. It will be OBVIOUS!!!
Exactly what 'research' have you do to back up these facts you are talking about?
...maybe this is why they have only examined half of the so called samples.
An incorrect statement that includes words like 'alleged' samples, and an assertion that more than half have never been looked at demand corrections.
The geochemical evolution of the Moon
Interviewer: You remained a consultant for NASA for 20 years, didn’t you?
Yes, as what they called a principal investigator. NASA were very good about issuing lunar samples. They decided very early that the samples would be available to anybody in the world who was sufficiently qualified and applied to work on them. There were two or three hundred principal investigators at various times working on the samples – the distribution of them is almost a reflection of gross national product. NASA have about 800 lbs of samples from Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17, and a lot of it even now has not been looked at. About half has been put into storage for future work and so on.
Originally posted by VitalOverdose
And i only said 'half' like it says in the article ..'more than half' is an exaggeration on your part.