It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
All seventeen Uighurs were members or associates of the Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM), otherwise known as the Turkestan Islamic Party (TIP). The ETIM/TIP is a U.S. and UN designated terrorist organization that is affiliated with al Qaeda.
Not only are all seventeen of the Uighurs allied with this group, but most of them were also trained in the ETIM/TIP's pre-September 11 training camp in Tora Bora, Afghanistan--a longtime stronghold for the Taliban and al Qaeda. There, their training was supervised by a noteworthy terrorist named Abdul Haq. Earlier this year, the Obama administration's Treasury Department designated Haq as an al Qaeda terrorist. The Treasury Department also noted that Haq is a member of al Qaeda's elite Shura (consultation) council, which is reserved for only those al Qaeda terrorists who are in its innermost circles. We know that the seventeen Uighurs were trained by Haq because at least eight of them have conceded as much during their hearings at Gitmo.
Originally posted by CuriousSkeptic
Do you have evidence of any crimes they committed or do you want to jail them because of the people they may know? This is very simple, they have not committed a crime, therefore there's no reason they should be in jail. I don't know why this is so hard for all of you.
[edit on 15-6-2009 by CuriousSkeptic]
Originally posted by Jakes51
Originally posted by CuriousSkeptic
Do you have evidence of any crimes they committed or do you want to jail them because of the people they may know? This is very simple, they have not committed a crime, therefore there's no reason they should be in jail. I don't know why this is so hard for all of you.
[edit on 15-6-2009 by CuriousSkeptic]
I don't want anyone imprisoned for the company they keep. However, why were these men consorting with known terrorists according the Department of Defense and why were they on the battlefield and take into custody by the military?
All I'm saying is give those men a trial and others before they are released and if it is proven in a fair court of law as to their innocence then we offer our apologies and support. I'm just a little hazy as to the situation surrounding their arrest and detention that's all.