It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spinalremain
It wasnt a video I watched. It was a scientific website that explained that the sun was exactly in the true center of the gallactic plane in the year 1998 and has been slowly moving above it. From what I can tell; there are 2 school's of thought on this. Some state that we are going to be alligned with the sun and the center in 2012 not only from our perspective but in reality on the same plane. And there are those that state we have already done so and that were currently above the plane. Rather still in the plane but slightly above center. I'm not scientist with diagnostic hardware to do the calculations so I'm basically confused. Im going to do some more reasearch and see if I can find some definitive answers. Have we crossed the gallactic plane yet? Shouldnt be so many conflicting theories on something that can be measured.
Originally posted by spinalremain
Right on. How could I not question it? Theres multiple theories from hundreds of scientists as to where we actually are along with many ppl on this forum swearing that they are scientists and that they know everything.
......................
there are no explanations able to accommodate such an observed phenomenon, either in the realm of classical physics or in the usual four-dimensional framework of the Einsteinian general relativity.
Originally posted by badmedia
I'm pretty sure it was directed at me.
.............
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by badmedia
Almost everyday we learn something new about the Universe, our Solar System, and even our own planet that once was thought to be impossible.
You are the one who wants to believe nomatter what that there is no possibility for such a companion star to exist, and you give the excuse that it must be bound by the laws that we know of. In this case you assume it must be bound by Kepler's law, yet there are things occurring in the Solar System that can't be explained, not even by Kepler's law.
Not too long ago Earth's magnetic field produced two very large breach in a manner scientists did not think was possible, because it went against everything they thought they knew. They thought it could not happen because they were wrong in their assumption that they know everything there is to know about the Earth's magnetic field, or even what could affect it in this manner.
These unexplained phenomenon I gave evidence of are not glitches. Scientists don't know what is causing them, but something is causing it. Whateve it is, it's affecting physically the planets, satellites, and even comets.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Originally posted by badmedia
I'm pretty sure it was directed at me.
.............
About this comment, he was responding to you, but that was not directed at you. I clarified that I never claimed to know everything.
Large 'Planet X' May Lurk Beyond Pluto
By Ker Than,LiveScience
Posted: 2008-06-19 17:56:30
Filed Under: Science News
(June 19) - An icy, unknown world might lurk in the distant reaches of our solar system beyond the orbit of Pluto, according to a new computer model.
The hidden world -- thought to be much bigger than Pluto based on the model -- could explain unusual features of the Kuiper Belt, a region of space beyond Neptune littered with icy and rocky bodies. Its existence would satisfy the long-held hopes and hypotheses for a "Planet X" envisioned by scientists and sci-fi buffs alike.
"Although the search for a distant planet in the solar system is old, it is far from over," said study team member Patryk Lykawka of Kobe University in Japan.
The model, created by Lykawka and Kobe University colleague Tadashi Mukai, is detailed in a recent issue of Astrophysical Journal.
If the new world is confirmed, it would not be technically a planet. Under a controversial new definition adopted by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) last week, it would instead be the largest known "plutoid."
The Kuiper Belt contains many peculiar features that cant be explained by standard solar system models. One is the highly irregular orbits of some of the belts members.
The most famous is Sedna, a rocky object located three times farther from the sun than Pluto. Sedna takes 12,000 years to travel once around the Sun, and its orbit ranges from 80 to 100 astronomical units (AU). One AU is equal to the distance between the Earth and the Sun.
Originally posted by badmedia
I'm not upset or anything. I had interest in this topic, still do and so forth. I'm looking for truth in things as well, and I've spent a decent amount of time looking into it. If there are these kinds of things out there, then they won't be acting in ways that are completely opposite of known physics.